2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2006.08.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meshless element free Galerkin method for unsteady nonlinear heat transfer problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(22) and (23) into Eqs. (18) and (19) leads to the residuals of di erential equation (R ) and Dirichlet boundary condition (R ) de ned as:…”
Section: Proposed Mixed Discrete Least Squares Meshless (Mdlsm) Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(22) and (23) into Eqs. (18) and (19) leads to the residuals of di erential equation (R ) and Dirichlet boundary condition (R ) de ned as:…”
Section: Proposed Mixed Discrete Least Squares Meshless (Mdlsm) Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Galerkin procedure was utilized to discretize the governing PDEs, leading to symmetric coe cient matrices. This method was successfully used to investigate various engineering problems such as static and dynamic analyses of shell structures [16], temperature eld problems [17], 2D fracture problems [18], and unsteady non-linear heat transfer [19]. The rate of convergence of the EFG method was shown to be higher than that of FEM [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Via incorporating fracture mechanics, many numerical simulations focus on evaluating the thermal stress intensity factors of originally existing fractures, which is essential for predicting the thermal induced fracture propagation. During these numerical investigations, the continuum-based numerical methods, i.e., the finite element method (FEM) [8], the extended finite element method (XFEM) [9], the meshless methods (MMs) [10] and the boundary element methods (BEMs) [11], are generally adopted. However, due to the limited capacities of the continuum-based numerical methods in simulating complex discontinuous geometries as well as the fracture mechanics on treating complex fracture patterns, only simple macroscale thermal fracture problems are studied in these numerical simulations.…”
Section: Basic Formulasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EFGM has been used to model a variety of physics, e.g. 2D linear elasticity [8][9][10], static and dynamic fracture mechanics [11,12], plate and shell analysis [13][14][15], vibration [7,16,17], electromagnetics [18], heat transfer [8,[19][20][21], metal forming [22,23], biomechanics [24,25] and geomechanics [26]. While the EFGM is superior to the FEM in terms of accuracy and convergence, and there are no issues of volumetric locking [27], MLS shape functions are computationally more expensive and complicate the imposition of essential boundary conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%