2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.124506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mesoporous molecularly imprinted polymer for removal of hormones from aqueous medium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The minimum value of χ 2 (0.96) and the maximum R 2 (0.99) value close to 1 for the fipronil on the MIP indicated the best fitting of pseudo-first order (PFO). These results indicate that the fipronil molecules are adsorbed on the binding sites of MIP via a physisorption mechanism that involves a physical interaction like hydrogen bonding between the functional groups of the adsorbent and the template . The nonlinear and linear forms of the PFO models are described in eqs and , respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The minimum value of χ 2 (0.96) and the maximum R 2 (0.99) value close to 1 for the fipronil on the MIP indicated the best fitting of pseudo-first order (PFO). These results indicate that the fipronil molecules are adsorbed on the binding sites of MIP via a physisorption mechanism that involves a physical interaction like hydrogen bonding between the functional groups of the adsorbent and the template . The nonlinear and linear forms of the PFO models are described in eqs and , respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…These results indicate that the fipronil molecules are adsorbed on the binding sites of MIP via a physisorption mechanism that involves a physical interaction like hydrogen bonding between the functional groups of the adsorbent and the template. 35 The nonlinear and linear forms of the PFO models are described in eqs 7 and 8 , respectively. Similarly, eqs 9 and 10 relate to the nonlinear and linear PSO models, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the E1 adsorption by few-layered boron nitride nanosheets 103 and E1 and E3 adsorption onto a mesoporous molecularly imprinted polymer 91 presented thermodynamic characteristics in parallel to that of. 100 The authors 91,100,102,103 reported that in physisorption, where the adsorption is caused because of the electrostatic interactions, the DG°is around −20 kJ mol −1 , while in chemisorption, the DG °ranges from −84 to −40 kJ mol −1 and adsorption occurs because of e − transfer, e − exchange or e − sharing. 100,102 further accentuated that owing to the hydrophobic prole of SE, during the sorption operation, there is an imbalance between the surface of the adsorbent and its internal forces, fostering the operation to molecular adsorption by the van der Walls force among many other interactions reported in Table 1.…”
Section: Adsorption Technique For the Removal Of Ses In Watermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigators 100,102 also underscore that the E3 adjacent OH groups perhaps thwart the interaction with biomass compared to E1 and E2 . However, Elias et al 102 differ by reporting that both LI and FI suit the experimental data of E1 and E2 adsorbed by nutshell AC, and this event was attributed to the complex mechanism. In addition, the E1 adsorption by few-layered boron nitride nanosheets 103 and E1 and E3 adsorption onto a mesoporous molecularly imprinted polymer 91 presented thermodynamic characteristics in parallel to that of. 100 The authors 91,100,102,103 reported that in physisorption, where the adsorption is caused because of the electrostatic interactions, the Δ G ° is around −20 kJ mol −1 , while in chemisorption, the Δ G ° ranges from −84 to −40 kJ mol −1 and adsorption occurs because of e − transfer, e − exchange or e − sharing.…”
Section: Adsorption Technique For the Removal Of Ses In Watermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation