2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2016.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mesozoic rift to post-rift tectonostratigraphy of the Sverdrup Basin, Canadian Arctic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
63
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the more localized increase in accommodation could have been caused by normal faulting as a precursor to the subsequent Late Jurassic to Cretaceous rifting between Norway and Greenland (Faleide et al, 1993). Small-scale tectonic activity in this period has not been addressed in detail by previous studies in the NBSB and is beyond the scope of the present study, but might correspond to similar rift-onset development in the Sverdrup Basin (Hadlari et al, 2016).…”
Section: Geological Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Second, the more localized increase in accommodation could have been caused by normal faulting as a precursor to the subsequent Late Jurassic to Cretaceous rifting between Norway and Greenland (Faleide et al, 1993). Small-scale tectonic activity in this period has not been addressed in detail by previous studies in the NBSB and is beyond the scope of the present study, but might correspond to similar rift-onset development in the Sverdrup Basin (Hadlari et al, 2016).…”
Section: Geological Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…After the first rift phase, marine deposition persisted through the Permian and Triassic periods. A second phase of rifting began in the Early Jurassic, continued through the Late Jurassicearliest Cretaceous interval, and then ceased in the Sverdrup Basin when seafloor spreading began in the adjacent proto-Amerasia Basin to form the Arctic Ocean (Hadlari et al 2016). Deposition in the Sverdrup Basin ended in the Palaeogene Period due to regional compression and widespread uplift associated with the Eurekan Orogeny (Embry & Beauchamp, 2019).…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, these models favor continuity with continentward dipping subduction systems along strike in the Cordillera (Miller et al, ). With breakup of Arctic Alaska from the Canadian Arctic margin possibly to have begun around 130 Ma, extension due to rollback would have become focused within Arctic Alaska after 125 Ma (Hadlari et al, ), setting the stage for the exhumation event inferred in this study. In this north dipping model, onset of magmatism at depth and/or adjacent to the Brooks Range may have thermally weakened the crust, driving extension and/or providing fluids to assist regional metamorphism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%