2012
DOI: 10.1080/02773945.2012.660369
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Messy Rhetoric: Identity Performance as Rhetorical Agency in Online Public Forums

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Much research has been done that examines online communities and the ways in which identities are shaped and public opinion is influenced in these spaces for digital discourse (Binns, 2012; Citron, 2013; Denzin, 1998; Grabill and Pigg, 2012; Hardacker, 2010; Sakki and Pettersson, 2015, to name a few). Studies such as Grabill and Pigg (2012) have examined interaction in online public forums and argue that these forums present methodological challenges for researchers because of the messy, non-linear ways in which participants engage. 4 In addition, they posit that online forums provide unique argumentative spaces for the leveraging of identity as a form of rhetorical agency: Those who do not hold traditional forms of expertise participate by performing identity in ways that extend beyond establishing individual credibility.…”
Section: Why Analyze Comment?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Much research has been done that examines online communities and the ways in which identities are shaped and public opinion is influenced in these spaces for digital discourse (Binns, 2012; Citron, 2013; Denzin, 1998; Grabill and Pigg, 2012; Hardacker, 2010; Sakki and Pettersson, 2015, to name a few). Studies such as Grabill and Pigg (2012) have examined interaction in online public forums and argue that these forums present methodological challenges for researchers because of the messy, non-linear ways in which participants engage. 4 In addition, they posit that online forums provide unique argumentative spaces for the leveraging of identity as a form of rhetorical agency: Those who do not hold traditional forms of expertise participate by performing identity in ways that extend beyond establishing individual credibility.…”
Section: Why Analyze Comment?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These performances create argumentative space by shaping how the conversation unfolds and enables the exchange of information and knowledge. (Grabill and Pigg, 2012: 101)…”
Section: Why Analyze Comment?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These differences can partly be explained by the pragmatic functions of the various particles and the common rhetorical purposes message board communication. Grabill and Pigg () identify four categories of rhetorical moves frequently made in online forums: building an argument, exploring new ideas, building a writer's identity, and building a community identity. In negotiating argument‐building and idea‐exploration, leh , lor , and lah are particularly useful resources in their capacity to signal stance and engagement.…”
Section: Singapore English Onlinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Science blogs, now numbering in the thousands (Batts, Anthis, & Smith, 2008;Zivkovic, 2012), have assumed a powerful role in the mass communication-and even in the deliberation-of science. Although they are only quasi-public forums (Habermas, 1992;Schickele, 1993), science blogs can nevertheless scaffold real-world political action on science-related issues (Barton, 2005;Cheng, Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, & Leskovec, 2014;Grabill & Pigg, 2012;Gurak & Antonijevic, 2009;Hardy & Scheufele, 2005;Manosevitch & Walker, 2009). Discussions among commenters on science blogs are thus perhaps best termed proto-deliberative.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%