1993
DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1993.tb05578.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mesulergine antagonism towards the fluoxetine anti-immobility effect in the forced swimming test in mice

Abstract: The anti-immobility effect of fluoxetine (40 mg kg-1) in the forced swimming test in mice was antagonized by the 5-HT1c/2 antagonist mesulergine (7.5 mg kg-1) and the dopamine D2 antagonist (+/-)-sulpiride (12.5 mg kg-1) but not by the 5-HT2/1C antagonist ritanserine (2 mg kg-1), the 5-HT1A/1B antagonist (-)-propranolol (20 mg kg-1) or the 5-HT3 antagonist DAU 6215 (0.1 mg kg-1). All compounds were administered intraperitoneally (i.p.) 6 min before fluoxetine, given i.p. 30 min before testing. The anti-immobil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
23
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it is possible to argue that acute fluoxetine reduces mesolimbic dopaminergic function by acting on 5-HT2C,2B receptors. This finding is consistent with a previous report showing that the anti-immobility effect of fluoxetine in the forced swimming test was blocked by mesulergine, but not by the mixed 5-HT2A/5-HT2C/2a antagonist ritanserin (Cesana et al, 1993) thus suggesting that this pharmacological effect was mediated by the 5-HT2C,2B receptor subtype.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, it is possible to argue that acute fluoxetine reduces mesolimbic dopaminergic function by acting on 5-HT2C,2B receptors. This finding is consistent with a previous report showing that the anti-immobility effect of fluoxetine in the forced swimming test was blocked by mesulergine, but not by the mixed 5-HT2A/5-HT2C/2a antagonist ritanserin (Cesana et al, 1993) thus suggesting that this pharmacological effect was mediated by the 5-HT2C,2B receptor subtype.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…It is now well established that fluoxetine is an effective antidepressant agent (Gram, 1994) which also has good therapeutic activity in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorders (Fontaine & Chouinard, 1986;Levine et al, 1989) and eating disorders (Freeman & Hampson, 1987;Kaye et al, 1991). There is evidence that the antidepressant effect of fluoxetine, assessed in the forced swimming test in mice, is antagonized by (±)-sulpiride a dopamine D2 receptor blocker (Cesana et al, 1993). These data are consistent with the general hypothesis that an enhancement of dopaminergic transmission in the mesolimbic system is involved in the antidepressant effect of several drugs (Cervo & Samanin, 1987;1988;Cervo et al, 1990).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Drug doses were 30 mg/kg fluoxetine, 20 mg/kg desipramine and 25 mg/kg imipramine. Doses were chosen on the basis of previous reports in mice of the anti-immobility effects of fluoxetine (Perrault et al 1992;Cesana et al 1993;Redrobe et al 1996;Eckeli et al 2000;Clenet et al 2001;Conti et al 2002), desipramine Vaugeois et al 1997;Srivastava and Nath 2000;Wong et al 2000;Clenet et al 2001;Cryan et al 2001;Lucki et al 2001;Conti et al 2002), and imipramine (Redrobe and Bourin 1997;Vaugeois et al 1997;Wong et al 2000;David et al 2001;Liu and Gershenfeld 2001;Do-Rego et al 2002).…”
Section: Drugsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…was administered twice daily for 3 days, with the last dose given 18 h prior to behavioral testing (Cesana et al, 1993). Depletion of 5-HT was confirmed by killing mice 1 h after behavioral testing and dissecting the hippocampus from mouse brain.…”
Section: Drugsmentioning
confidence: 99%