2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.05.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meta-analysis comparing the outcomes of single stage (foreskin pedicled tube) versus two stage (foreskin free graft & foreskin pedicled flap) repair for proximal hypospadias in the last decade

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
20
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the treatment of severe hypospadias is a great challenge for pediatric urologists. There are different opinions on the choice of single-stage versus staged operations [ 2 , 3 ]. We believe that the experience of the surgeon and the severity of hypospadias are the main determinants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the treatment of severe hypospadias is a great challenge for pediatric urologists. There are different opinions on the choice of single-stage versus staged operations [ 2 , 3 ]. We believe that the experience of the surgeon and the severity of hypospadias are the main determinants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 20 recent articles [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] on meta-analyses were published in the JPUrol between October 9, 2017, and May 17, 2021. Of these, only seven [19][20][21][22][23][24][25] were included for the calculation of FI.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these, only seven [19][20][21][22][23][24][25] were included for the calculation of FI. The remaining were excluded as they incorporated non-comparative studies [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] and/or none of the defined methods for pooling the estimates (Mantel-Haenszel or inverse variance or Peto) were identified in them [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. Among the seven included studies, there were 22 individual meta-analyses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two-stage procedure is considered as a method to reduce the difficulty of surgery, in terms of increasing the available prepuce, tissue vascularity and providing a healthier urethral bed for the second stage surgery [ 28 ]. Reportedly, it has relatively low risk of complications [ 6 , 27 , 29 , 30 ]. However, compared with two-stage urethroplasty, most of the patients can avoid re-operation who undergo a single-stage urethroplasty.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%