2005
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dki060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meta-analysis of bacterial resistance to macrolides

Abstract: Reported macrolide resistance of S. pneumoniae varies substantially and may be a significant issue in certain regions. Use of meta-analysis to aggregate individual studies enabled determination of robust values for macrolide resistance. This information is useful for clinical and policy decision makers in developing appropriate antibiotic strategies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If zero events occurred, a correction factor of 0.5 was applied. When the number of original studies was less than four, meta-analysis with random-effects model was only conducted to obtain an average estimate; the 95% CI was presented accordingly [21], [22], [23], [24]. To assess differences in geographic regions, poison regression was used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If zero events occurred, a correction factor of 0.5 was applied. When the number of original studies was less than four, meta-analysis with random-effects model was only conducted to obtain an average estimate; the 95% CI was presented accordingly [21], [22], [23], [24]. To assess differences in geographic regions, poison regression was used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a meta‐analysis Halpern and colleagues (29 studies; 1998‐2003) found the mean resistance of S. pneumoniae isolates to azithromycin was 27.2% (95% CI 24.6–29.7) and to erythromycin was 30.4% (95% CI 28.1–32.7). Too few studies of clarithromycin were included to allow an accurate evaluation of resistance .…”
Section: Risks Of Long‐term Use Of Macrolidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the number of pneumococcal strains showing in vitro resistance to this class of antibacterials has increased dramatically across the world in the last decade [1,2]. Although the link between resistance measured in the laboratory and adverse clinical outcome has not been fully substantiated to date, an increasing number of reports of treatment failure associated with macrolide-resistant pneumococcal infections [3,4] have raised concern over the continued clinical utility of the macrolides.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%