2005
DOI: 10.1007/11526018_45
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meta-data: Characterization of Input Features for Meta-learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
62
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
62
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Sohn (1999) notices that some of the characteristics are highly correlated, and she omits the redundant ones in her study. Castiello et al (2005) provide formulas for different data characteristics (meta-features) and theoretically discuss their relevance. However, their assumptions are based on intuition and theoretical knowledge.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sohn (1999) notices that some of the characteristics are highly correlated, and she omits the redundant ones in her study. Castiello et al (2005) provide formulas for different data characteristics (meta-features) and theoretically discuss their relevance. However, their assumptions are based on intuition and theoretical knowledge.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been many studies with regard to the use (what kinds of meta-data to be used) (Castiello et al, 2005) and selection (which are the most relevant) (Kalousis and Hilario, 2001) of meta-features or meta-data (Bilalli et al, 2016) in general. However, these studies have been performed independently and in specific domains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic examples of meta-learning can be found in the variable bias management system (VBMS) [47] which automatically choses a learning algorithm based on two meta-parameters: the number of features and the number of vectors, often extended by descriptors representing the number of features of given type. An extension of this idea is a meta-learning system which is based on a set of meta-variables describing aggregated statistical and information theory properties of individual attributes and class labels [5,6,[48][49][50]. Commonly reported meta-features of this type include: canonical correlation for the best single combination of features (called cancor1), canonical correlation for the best single combination of features orthogonal to cancor1, the first normalized eigenvalue of the canonical discriminant matrix, the second normalized eigenvalue of the canonical discriminant matrix, the mean kurtosis of attributes of T, the mean skewness of attributes of T, the mean mutual information of class and feature, joint entropy of a class variable and attribute, and entropy of classes, etc.…”
Section: Meta-learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is based on representing the training set, which consists of n feature vectors by a single meta-date instance, and then uses it as an input to the meta-model which returns the estimate of the accuracy without training the actual (base) model [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meta-features have been commonly employed in several works [29,30,31,32] and projects, such as StatLog and METAL. Table 2 reports a selection of meta-features; for a thorough description of those measures the interested reader is addressed to [33].…”
Section: About the Meta-feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%