Metabolic fingerprinting of gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) liver to track interactions between dietary factors and seasonal temperature variations

Abstract

Farmed gilthead seabream is sometimes affected by a metabolic syndrome, known as the “winter disease”, which has a significant economic impact in the Mediterranean region. It is caused, among other factors, by the thermal variations that occur during colder months and there are signs that an improved nutritional status can mitigate the effects of this thermal stress. For this reason, a trial was undertaken where we assessed the effect of two different diets on gilthead seabream physiology and nutritional state, through metabolic fingerprinting of hepatic tissue. For this trial, four groups of 25 adult gilthead seabream were reared for 8 months, being fed either with a control diet (CTRL, low-cost commercial formulation) or with a diet called “Winter Feed” (WF, high-cost improved formulation). Fish were sampled at two time-points (at the end of winter and at the end of spring), with liver tissue being taken for FT-IR spectroscopy. Results have shown that seasonal temperature variations constitute a metabolic challenge for gilthead seabream, with hepatic carbohydrate stores being consumed over the course of the inter-sampling period. Regarding the WF diet, results point towards a positive effect in terms of performance and improved nutritional status. This diet seems to have a mitigating effect on the deleterious impact of thermal shifts, confirming the hypothesis that nutritional factors can affect the capacity of gilthead seabream to cope with seasonal thermal variations and possibly contribute to prevent the onset of “winter disease”.

Metabolomics and fish nutrition: a review in the context of sustainable feed development

“…; Silva et al . ). Fish welfare studies aim to characterize the stress response of fish due to farming practices such as fish handling (Karakach et al .…”

“…The main metabolomic applications for fish health concern host-pathogen interactions (Solanky et al 2005;Guo et al 2014;Ma et al 2015;Peng et al 2015), disease characterization (Stentiford et al 2005;Southam et al 2008) and treatment efficiency (Cheng et al 2014;Su et al 2015;Zhao et al 2015). Interestingly, metabolomics approaches help to design feed formulations allowing the efficacy of treatments to be enhanced (Cheng et al 2014;Ma et al 2015;Su et al 2015), or nutraceutical feed that prevents disease to be developed (Robles et al 2013;Silva et al 2014). Fish welfare studies aim to characterize the stress response of fish due to farming practices such as fish handling (Karakach et al 2009) and netting (Mushtaq et al 2014).…”

Untargeted metabolomics approach for unraveling robust biomarkers of nutritional status in fasted gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata)

“…However, we need to refine our knowledge on nutrient requirements to produce more robust, safe and quality fish, especially with the advent of new diet formulations based on alternative plant ingredients rather than marine feedstuffs ( Karalazos et al, 2007 ; Médale et al, 2013 ; Benedito-Palos et al, 2016 ). As a result, research in fish nutrition is moving from classical methodologies to omics approaches, including transcriptomics ( Benedito-Palos, Ballester-Lozano & Pérez-Sánchez, 2014 ; Louro, Power & Canario, 2014 ), proteomics ( Rodrigues et al, 2012 ; Wrzesinski et al, 2013 ) and metabolomics ( Kullgren et al, 2010 ; Silva et al, 2014 ; Asakura et al, 2014 ).…”

Showcasing metabolomic applications in aquaculture: a review

“…; Silva et al . ); effects of nutrient supplementation in sea bream, salmon and carp (Cajka et al . ; Robles et al .…”