2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2004.01.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metabolic fingerprinting of wild type and transgenic tobacco plants by 1H NMR and multivariate analysis technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
140
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
140
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, as the derivative of choline, phosphocholine was decreased consistently with the decreased choline. The decrease of glucose in salinity-treated plants after 1 week exposure indicated the rapid utilization of this compound for the production of other compounds such as citrate, malate, and fumarate, or a lower production of carbohydrates (Choi et al 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, as the derivative of choline, phosphocholine was decreased consistently with the decreased choline. The decrease of glucose in salinity-treated plants after 1 week exposure indicated the rapid utilization of this compound for the production of other compounds such as citrate, malate, and fumarate, or a lower production of carbohydrates (Choi et al 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, NMR-based metabolomics has been widely used to decode the broad range of chemical compounds that might be implicated in the plant defence against microbe attacks (Choi et al, 2006;Ward et al, 2010). Our group has been applying this technology to the detection and structure elucidation of metabolites in plants upon 105 treatment with a wide range of biotic and abiotic stress agents (Choi et al, 2004;Simoh et al, 2009;Jahangir et al, 2009;Mirnezhad et al, 2010;Simoh et al, 2010). In recent years, very detailed NMR metabolomic studies on both compatible and incompatible plant-pathogen interactions have been reported (Lima et al, 2010;Bollina et al, 2010;Ward et al, 2010;Jones et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a practical point of view, monitoring of unexpected effects of metabolic engineering is clearly of great importance and metabolic profiling analyses that cover the widest range of metabolites may prove particularly informative. For this purpose, non-targeted methods based on GC-MS (Fiehn et al 2000;Garrat et al 2005;Roessner-Tunali et al 2003), HPLC-UV (photodiode array detection) (Fraser et al2000), HPLC-MS (Huhman and Sumner 2002;Roepenack-Lahaye et al 2004), 1 H-NMR (Baker et al 2006;Choi et al 2004;Gall et al 2003;Manetti et al 2004; see also the review by Ward et al 2007), and high-resolution MS (Hirai et al 2004;Oikawa et al 2006) have been applied. Given the wide chemical and quantitative diversity of plant metabolites, however, no single analytical methodology can provide a definitive and absolute metabolite profile.…”
Section: Methodology Of Metabolite Profiling Of Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the various multi-variate analysis techniques, principal component analysis (PCA) appears to be used most frequently in order to evaluate metabolic changes in GM crops (Choi et al 2004;Fiehn et al 2000;Gall et al 2003). Evaluation of loading plots can be used to find those metabolites most affected by genetic modification and which most contribute to the genotype difference (Baker et al 2006;Defernez et al 2004;Taylor et al 2002).…”
Section: Methodology Of Metabolite Profiling Of Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%