1984
DOI: 10.1139/z84-110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metabolizable energy requirements for maintenance and faecal and urinary losses of juvenile harp seals (Phoca groenlandica)

Abstract: Assimilation efficiency of energy in juvenile harp seals was 92.5–95.0% of gross energy intake when fed Atlantic herring and 72.2% when fed shrimp. Faecal energy losses increased directly with intake. Metabolizable energy (ME) ranged from 85.5 to 88.7% of gross energy intake for a diet of herring. Urinary energy losses increased directly with apparent digestible nitrogen intake. Faecal and urinary losses were not affected significantly by feeding frequency. Urine excretion indicated that feeding causes a diure… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
33
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
8
33
2
Order By: Relevance
“…During our summer experiment, ME did not decrease significantly for any of the diet groups, meaning there was no overall evidence of energy expenditure sparing during the restriction from thermorégu-lation, activity, and basal metabolism. Counterintuitively, allocation to ME increased after 2 wk of restriction for group H, as has been observed in other species during nutritional stress (Mrosovsky and Sherry 1980;Keiver et al 1984;Ali et al 2003). This increase in energy allocated to ME may have been why animals in group H seemed to release more energy from their body than the actual gross energy deficit (198%, even though it was not significantly greater than 100% ofthe energy deficit; see Table 2).…”
Section: Energetic Priorities During Summersupporting
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…During our summer experiment, ME did not decrease significantly for any of the diet groups, meaning there was no overall evidence of energy expenditure sparing during the restriction from thermorégu-lation, activity, and basal metabolism. Counterintuitively, allocation to ME increased after 2 wk of restriction for group H, as has been observed in other species during nutritional stress (Mrosovsky and Sherry 1980;Keiver et al 1984;Ali et al 2003). This increase in energy allocated to ME may have been why animals in group H seemed to release more energy from their body than the actual gross energy deficit (198%, even though it was not significantly greater than 100% ofthe energy deficit; see Table 2).…”
Section: Energetic Priorities During Summersupporting
confidence: 74%
“…When faced with energy restrictions, animals can utilize a range of bioenergetic adjustments including increased digestive efficiencies, behavioral adjustments to reduce activity or thermal costs, decreases in basal metabolism, and changes in grovrth and in foraging effort (Mrosovsky and Sherry 1980;Keiver et al 1984;Worthy and Lavigne 1987;McCarter and McGee 1989;Nordoy et al 1990;Oritsland 1990;Markussen et al 1992;Trites 1999, 2002;Ali et al 2003). During the summer restriction, all animals in our study (independent of diet type) relied exclusively on internal energy reserves to balance their budgets when faced with energy deficits caused by reduced energy intake.…”
Section: Energetic Priorities During Summermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pinnipeds consuming a diet of herring or squid have measured digestive efficiencies of~0.90-0.97 (Keiver et al 1984;Fadely et al 1990;Fisher et al 1991;Lawson et al 1997a). We therefore assumed the digestive efficiency of Pacific whitesided dolphins was uniformly distributed between 0.90 and 0.97 (i.e., energy loss was uniformly distributed from 3% to 10% of total energy intake).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lavigne et al 1985, Keiver et al 1984, which may be app licable in the present context. But again, the allocation to certain regions or seasons is highly speculative.…”
Section: ---mentioning
confidence: 59%