2022
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1389767/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metagenomic pipeline for identifying co-infections among distinct SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern: Study cases from Alpha to Omicron

Abstract: Concomitant infection or co-infection with distinct SARS-CoV-2 genotypes have been reported as part of the epidemiological surveillance of the COVID-19 pandemic. In the context of the spread of more transmissible variants during 2021, co-infections are not only important due to the possible changes in the clinical outcome, but also the chance to generate new genotypes by recombination. However, a few approaches have developed bioinformatic pipelines to identify co-infections. Here we present a metagenomic pipe… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their study involved 306 SARS-CoV-2-positive patients with respiratory pathogen panel (RPP) and they observed severe COVID-19 effect in 111 (36.3%) patients in the SARS-CoV-2-only group and 3 (21.4%) patients in the co-infected group, even though the result was not significantly different [ 46 ]. Molina-Mora et al (2022) have utilized two different approaches one being the metagenomic pipeline which is based on the inference of multiple fragments such as amplicon sequence variant (ASV-like) from sequencing data and a custom SARS-CoV-2 database to identify the concomitant presence of divergent SARS-CoV-2 genomes which were used to analyze 1021 cases of COVID-19 from Costa Rica to investigate the possible occurrence of co-infections and compared this with another strategy which was based on the whole-genome (metagenome) assembly; the results indicated an accuracy of about 96.2% with for ASV-like and 46.2% for the whole—genome assembly strategy [ 47 ].…”
Section: Mode Of Spreadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their study involved 306 SARS-CoV-2-positive patients with respiratory pathogen panel (RPP) and they observed severe COVID-19 effect in 111 (36.3%) patients in the SARS-CoV-2-only group and 3 (21.4%) patients in the co-infected group, even though the result was not significantly different [ 46 ]. Molina-Mora et al (2022) have utilized two different approaches one being the metagenomic pipeline which is based on the inference of multiple fragments such as amplicon sequence variant (ASV-like) from sequencing data and a custom SARS-CoV-2 database to identify the concomitant presence of divergent SARS-CoV-2 genomes which were used to analyze 1021 cases of COVID-19 from Costa Rica to investigate the possible occurrence of co-infections and compared this with another strategy which was based on the whole-genome (metagenome) assembly; the results indicated an accuracy of about 96.2% with for ASV-like and 46.2% for the whole—genome assembly strategy [ 47 ].…”
Section: Mode Of Spreadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those analyses reveal the detection of mutations in line with other studies but also point out the local increases, particularly in the detection of Spike-T1117I variant. These constant genomic rearrangements may offer some explanation for the variations in transmission rates, symptoms, tropisms, and virulence of the SARS-CoV-2 [ 33 , 34 , 35 ].…”
Section: Potential Pathophysiological Mechanisms Of Covid-19mentioning
confidence: 99%