2014
DOI: 10.1007/s12597-014-0190-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metaheuristic applications on discrete facility location problems: a survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent survey articles focus on applications of facility location in design of distribution systems (Klose and Drexl 2005), or supply chain management (Melo et al 2009), and a more general survey on UFL is given in Verter (2011). Approaches applied to UFL range from approximation algorithms (Li 2013, Shmoys et al 1997, over (semi-)Lagrangian relaxations (Beltran-Royo et al 2012) and metaheuristics (see, e.g., a survey in Basu et al 2015), to branch-and-bound-based algorithms in which lower bounds are calculated using dual ascent procedures (see, e.g., Letchford and Miller 2014). The state-of-the-art exact algorithm for UFL is given in Posta et al (2014): the algorithm is based on a message passing approach in which a metaheuristic calculates the upper bounds and passes the information to a branch-and-bound algorithm in which lower bounds are obtained by a Lagrangian relaxation solved using a bundle method.…”
Section: Linear Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent survey articles focus on applications of facility location in design of distribution systems (Klose and Drexl 2005), or supply chain management (Melo et al 2009), and a more general survey on UFL is given in Verter (2011). Approaches applied to UFL range from approximation algorithms (Li 2013, Shmoys et al 1997, over (semi-)Lagrangian relaxations (Beltran-Royo et al 2012) and metaheuristics (see, e.g., a survey in Basu et al 2015), to branch-and-bound-based algorithms in which lower bounds are calculated using dual ascent procedures (see, e.g., Letchford and Miller 2014). The state-of-the-art exact algorithm for UFL is given in Posta et al (2014): the algorithm is based on a message passing approach in which a metaheuristic calculates the upper bounds and passes the information to a branch-and-bound algorithm in which lower bounds are obtained by a Lagrangian relaxation solved using a bundle method.…”
Section: Linear Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Manthey & Tijink [19] addressed the perturbation resilience by optimizing an uncapacitated discrete facility location problem. Although the discrete location model reflects reality more accurately in most cases, the researchers hold negative views on the practicality of the model in large-scale problems [20]. Most discrete location models are nondeterministic polynomial (NP) hard and suffer from excessive computational burden.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the UWL, a subset of locations from a given set of potential locations is required for establishing warehouses so as to optimize a given function of these chosen locations while satisfying certain constraints (Basu et al, 2015;Michel and Van Hentenryck, 2004). In this section, the variables of the UWL problem are described.…”
Section: Uwl Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%