2021
DOI: 10.1097/rli.0000000000000823
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metal Artifact Reduction With Tin Prefiltration in Computed Tomography

Abstract: Objectives: With the aging population and thus rising numbers of orthopedic implants (OIs), metal artifacts (MAs) increasingly pose a problem for computed tomography (CT) examinations. In the study presented here, different MA reduction techniques (iterative metal artifact reduction software [iMAR], tin prefilter technique, and dual-energy CT [DECT]) were compared. Materials and Methods: Four human cadaver pelvises with OIs were scanned on a third-generation DECT scanner using tin prefilter (Sn), dual-energy (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
20
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
4
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Soft tissue examinations and especially examinations with contrast media should not be performed with this technique 41 . Significant advantages have already been demonstrated, for example, for paranasal sinuses, 6,7,41 lung imaging, 5,43 and metal artifact reduction 18 . Photon-counting detector CT scanners mark the beginning of a new era in CT imaging 45–48 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Soft tissue examinations and especially examinations with contrast media should not be performed with this technique 41 . Significant advantages have already been demonstrated, for example, for paranasal sinuses, 6,7,41 lung imaging, 5,43 and metal artifact reduction 18 . Photon-counting detector CT scanners mark the beginning of a new era in CT imaging 45–48 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mild impairment was observed in ND as well as in Sn LD protocols because of restrictions due to metal artifacts that were similarly displayed in ND and Sn LD protocols. The potential of tin filter-based protocols without dose reduction to reduce metal artifacts has already been described by Hackenbroch et al 18 Other effective metal artifact reduction techniques described in the literature, [30][31][32][33][34][35] such as DE, virtual monoenergetic CT images (VMI), and postprocessing with iterative metal artifact reduction (IMAR) software, showed disadvantages compared with the tin filter technique. 18 The most common described disadvantages of CT images postprocessed with IMAR and VMI were the generation of novel artifacts by IMAR 33,[36][37][38] and the "blurring" of osseous structures in VMI.…”
Section: †Anovamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…6 The combination of 150 kV in prefiltration and iterative metal artifact reduction may improve image quality and reduce the effective dose. 7 It is advisable to review original and postprocessed data sets because iterative metal artifact reduction techniques may introduce new artifacts around implants depending on settings and techniques. 8 Whereas metal artifact reduction software focuses primarily on decreasing dark streak artifacts from photon starvation, dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) effectively decreases metal implant-induced bright streak artifacts due to beam-hardening artifacts.…”
Section: Computed Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%