2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2019.03.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metal-organic framework (MOF-5) coated SERS active gold gratings: A platform for the selective detection of organic contaminants in soil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several materials and morphologies have been explored with this particular application in mind—Ag nanoflowers [18], Au/Ag nanorods [14], and colloidal Au nanoparticles [19] among others, all of which showed capabilities of detecting low pesticide concentrations, down to 10 −10 M. However, aside from sensitivity, there are still more factors to consider in this particular application, such as the reproducibility of results and the capability of the substrates to detect multiple pesticides in real food matrices [20,21]. To address these issues, morphology control and material selection have been given emphasis, focusing on achieving large-scale uniformity in obtaining SERS measurements [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several materials and morphologies have been explored with this particular application in mind—Ag nanoflowers [18], Au/Ag nanorods [14], and colloidal Au nanoparticles [19] among others, all of which showed capabilities of detecting low pesticide concentrations, down to 10 −10 M. However, aside from sensitivity, there are still more factors to consider in this particular application, such as the reproducibility of results and the capability of the substrates to detect multiple pesticides in real food matrices [20,21]. To address these issues, morphology control and material selection have been given emphasis, focusing on achieving large-scale uniformity in obtaining SERS measurements [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 6(c) shows a comparison of the LOD and EF results between this study and those of other studies. It can be seen that the performance of the prepared SERS substrate in this study is higher than the others, thus indicating its excellent detection sensitivity (Cai et al, 2018;Guselnikova et al, 2019;D. Li et al, 2019;Q.…”
Section: Sers Sensitivity Evaluation Of C-ag@zif-67 Substratesmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Even though the EFs of these materials are not comparable with Ag and Au substrates, it is possible to gain other advantages by compositing them with traditional SERS substrates (Jiao et al., 2021). As discussed in previous sections, the capability and performance of SERS‐based methods can be improved through introducing nanomaterials such as MXenes (Zheng et al., 2019), MOFs (Guselnikova et al., 2019), and nanozymes (Huang, Sun, Pu, & Wei, 2019). Second, more recognition elements should be screened for different types of mycotoxins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schematic illustration of mycotoxins detection based on SERS. Some of the images are reprinted with permission from various studies (Q. Chen et al., 2018; Foti et al., 2018; Guselnikova et al., 2019; Kang et al., 2019; J. Li et al., 2019; Shao et al., 2018; Song et al., 2018; X. Wang et al., 2018; Y. Wu et al., 2018; Yang et al., 2017; Zhu et al., 2020)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%