“…In contrast, sample C exhibits more aspherical particles with larger diameters (39.4 Ϯ 20.3 nm) compared to sample A (25 Ϯ 5.6 nm) (Figure 8, Table 4), although the substrate temperature was maintained at 500°C, but oxygen was used as reactive gas during the deposition experiment (Table 4). The observed surface topography of samples A-C differs from deposition experiments performed with complexes such as [Cu(OCRCHC(Me) NCH 2 CH 2 NX 2 )(μ-OAc)] 2 [8] (R = Me, Ph; X = OMe, NMe 2 ), [Cu(hfac) 2 TMEDA] [10] (TMEDA = N,N,N',N'-tetramethylethylenediamine), [Cu((py)CHCOCF 3 ) 2 ] 2 (py = pyridine) [73] and [Cu(hfac)(η 2 -H 2 C=CHC(CH 3 ) 3 ]. [74] The films obtained from the latter precursors show closed Cu layers with a particulate surface, in contrast, complex 6 displays island growth (Figure 8), which can be ascribed to the lattice mismatch between copper and silicon, [73,75,76] or to the high thermal stability as well as decreased volatility of 6.…”