2016
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw1477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metallicity-constrained merger rates of binary black holes and the stochastic gravitational wave background

Abstract: The recent detection of the binary black hole merger GW150914 demonstrates the existence of black holes more massive than previously observed in X-ray binaries in our Galaxy. This article explores different scenarios of black hole formation in the context of self-consistent cosmic chemical evolution models that simultaneously match observations of the cosmic star formation rate, optical depth to reionization and metallicity of the interstellar medium. This framework is used to calculate the mass distribution o… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
134
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
3
134
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For comparison, the stochastic background at 25 Hz inferred from GW150914 is ΩGW(25Hz) = 1.1 +2.7 −0.9 × 10 −9 at 90% confidence level, and the aLIGO/advanced Virgo network 1σ sensitivity (corresponding to SNR = 1) for two years of observation at design sensitivity (O5) is ΩGW(25Hz) = 6.6 × 10 −10 . The stochastic background produced by Pop III remnant mergers is therefore negligible at the relevant frequencies (compare Dvorkin et al 2016, but see Inayoshi et al 2016). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For comparison, the stochastic background at 25 Hz inferred from GW150914 is ΩGW(25Hz) = 1.1 +2.7 −0.9 × 10 −9 at 90% confidence level, and the aLIGO/advanced Virgo network 1σ sensitivity (corresponding to SNR = 1) for two years of observation at design sensitivity (O5) is ΩGW(25Hz) = 6.6 × 10 −10 . The stochastic background produced by Pop III remnant mergers is therefore negligible at the relevant frequencies (compare Dvorkin et al 2016, but see Inayoshi et al 2016). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this assertion is supported in some models which take into account the explosion mechanism, the metallicity history and the time delay distribution (see e.g. [10,87]), it presents a source of additional uncertainty. In follow up work, our analysis can be extended by incorporating the dependence of the merger rate on both mass and metallicity, and following the cosmic history of star formation and metallicity distribution, as well as the distribution of the delay time between formation and merger of the binaries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the first detection of GW150914, several investigations have examined how double black hole binaries could have been produced from the evolution of massive stars, whether from classical isolated evolution in low-metallicity environments (Belczynski et al 2016a;Eldridge & Stanway 2016); via the aid of rapid rotation and hence homogeneous chemical evolution Woosley 2016); via Population III stars (Hartwig et al 2016;Inayoshi et al 2016;Dvorkin et al 2016); or from dynamical formation in interacting environments (Mapelli 2016;Rodriguez et al 2016). Other more exotic scenarios have been introduced and discussed in the context of GW150914; dark matter primordial BH-BH formation (Sasaki et al 2016;Eroshenko 2016), formation of a BH-BH merger from a divided core of a massive rapidly rotating single star (Loeb 2016), or formation of BH-BH mergers with disks around BHs formed from fallback material in weak supernova explosions (Perna et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%