1978
DOI: 10.2475/ajs.278.6.769
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metamorphic bathozones and bathograds; a measure of the depth of post-metamorphic uplift and erosion on the regional scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
77
0
2

Year Published

1979
1979
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
77
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Without additional independent evidence, his calculated pressure conditions of 6 kbar cannot be considered reliable. We propose a minimum pressure of approximately 3 kbar, equivalent to bathozone 3 of Carmichael (1978). M 2 is characterized by the successive overprinting of rotated staurolite and garnet porphyroblasts by andalusite and cordierite (Fig.…”
Section: P-t Pathmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without additional independent evidence, his calculated pressure conditions of 6 kbar cannot be considered reliable. We propose a minimum pressure of approximately 3 kbar, equivalent to bathozone 3 of Carmichael (1978). M 2 is characterized by the successive overprinting of rotated staurolite and garnet porphyroblasts by andalusite and cordierite (Fig.…”
Section: P-t Pathmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La carte des bathogrades ainsi dressée (CARMICHAEL, 1978) pour les séries pélitiques métamorphosées au Dévonien, dans le nord de la Nouvelle-Angleterre implique l'ablation d'une tranche de 17 km par l'érosion. Telle est, en effet, la pression critique correspondant à l'équilibre: andalousite = kyanite + sillimanite.…”
Section: B Rôle Respectif Des Soulèvements Verti-caux Des Aplanisseunclassified
“…B&W inferred that this assemblage(?) required pressures of at least 5 kbar by assuming temperatures and pressures equivalent to, or above, the breakdown of staurolite to kyanite + Fe-rich garnet [Carmichael, 1978]. This assumption is unwarranted because the kyanite-bearing rocks are above staurolitebearing schists, and in fact, the upward appearance of kyanite coincides with the upward disappearance of staurolite [Rowles, 1982].…”
Section: Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%