2009
DOI: 10.4321/s0004-06142009000300008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metástasis testicular como primera manifestación clínica de melanoma maligno de origen desconocido

Abstract: It is appropriate to bear in mind the possibility of testicular metastasis of a primary unknown tumor in adult males since metastatic affectation can constitute the first manifestation of the disease.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, non-neoplastic melanoblasts resulting from the migration of melanin-producing cells from the neural crest to mesodermal derivatives during embryologic development can explain the presence of melanocytes in the testis and support the possibility of a primary melanoma developing at this rare site. We report this case to emphasize the need for awareness of the possibility of the testis being the primary site in a bird with melanoma and to underline the necessity of considering a metastatic melanoma from unknown primary sites ( Katiyar et al., 2007 ; Contreras et al., 2009 ; Aslam et al., 2010 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…On the other hand, non-neoplastic melanoblasts resulting from the migration of melanin-producing cells from the neural crest to mesodermal derivatives during embryologic development can explain the presence of melanocytes in the testis and support the possibility of a primary melanoma developing at this rare site. We report this case to emphasize the need for awareness of the possibility of the testis being the primary site in a bird with melanoma and to underline the necessity of considering a metastatic melanoma from unknown primary sites ( Katiyar et al., 2007 ; Contreras et al., 2009 ; Aslam et al., 2010 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%