1992
DOI: 10.1016/s0344-0338(11)80075-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metastatic capacity and differentiation in murine melanoma cell lines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the only other report we have found in the literature, the volume fraction of melanosomes in another murine melanoma cell line (B16) was reported to be 0.9-1.2% (Maiorana et al, 1992) against the range of 2.34% that we found, but it should be noted that the Cloudman S91 subline that we studied, Me1 l l a , was originally cloned for its high degree of melanization.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 44%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the only other report we have found in the literature, the volume fraction of melanosomes in another murine melanoma cell line (B16) was reported to be 0.9-1.2% (Maiorana et al, 1992) against the range of 2.34% that we found, but it should be noted that the Cloudman S91 subline that we studied, Me1 l l a , was originally cloned for its high degree of melanization.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 44%
“…Stereological studies of melanosomes first appeared in 1992. The melanosome volume density (VV), surface density (&), numerical density (Nv), and mean area ( S ) were estimated to evaluate metastatic capacity and differentiation in B16 murine melanoma cells (Maiorana et al, 1992) but no data on the Vvof melanosomes were provided. Goodall et al (1994) estimated the size of melanosomes in B16 melanoma cells, but only by reference to their diameter, while the length and diameter of melanosomes from 17 tis-sues, including Cloudman S91 melanoma cells, have been reported by Hach et al (1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(17), have been used to investigate the cell biological mechanisms of metastasis and the inhibitory action of agents on the metastasis of melanoma cells at the biochemical or the molecular levels in many laboratories. Accordingly, many characteristics associated with their different meta-static abilities have been analysed and published (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6). In order to further clarify the differences in the cell-and immune-biological properties between these two cell lines, we focused our study on the levels of expression of proto-oncogene c-fos, the sensitivities to LAK cells and/or IL-2 in vivo, and the components of gangliosides in vitro and in vivo.…”
Section: Analysis Of Ganglioside Components Of Cultured B16-f1 and Flmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cell biological properties of murine melanoma B16 variants have been extensively investigated in order to clarify the mechanisms of their different metastatic potentials (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6). However, there have been no definite conclusions about which properties or factors are responsible for the differences in metastatic potentials between the two cell lines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attention has been particularly focused on nuclear morphology, DNA content and chromatin structure [6,43]. In the context of metastatic potential, comparisons of mouse B16 melanoma cell lines revealed in highly metastatic variants an increased chromatin condensation [31], heterogeneity of DNA ploidy and an increased nuclear pleomorphism [25,26]. Moreover, fibroblasts transfected by the H-ras oncogene exhibited increased levels of chromatin condensation when compared to non-transformed cells [28,29] although it was difficult in this system to correlate directly chromatin changes, ras levels or metastatic ability [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%