2008
DOI: 10.1134/s1028335808020092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meteor and fireball trajectories for high values of the mass loss parameter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As it can be seen in table 1, differences between observational and analytical values are remarkable (the standard deviation is σ = 4.11 km) and we conclude that the method proposed by Gritsevich and Popelenskaya (2008) cannot be extended to be applicable for decelerated fireballs without further modification, though it is usable to derive parameters of small meteoroids with constant velocity (Popelenskaya 2010). Figure 1 shows graphically the obtained differences between the observed and derived terminal height values based on equation ( 20).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As it can be seen in table 1, differences between observational and analytical values are remarkable (the standard deviation is σ = 4.11 km) and we conclude that the method proposed by Gritsevich and Popelenskaya (2008) cannot be extended to be applicable for decelerated fireballs without further modification, though it is usable to derive parameters of small meteoroids with constant velocity (Popelenskaya 2010). Figure 1 shows graphically the obtained differences between the observed and derived terminal height values based on equation ( 20).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In this paper, we have derived the terminal heights for MORP fireballs using newly developed as well as previously suggested methodology. This methodology had only been tested on several fully ablated fireballs with large β values by Gritsevich and Popelenskaya (2008). We were particularly interested in determining whether this new mathematical approach works equally accurately with fully ablated fireballs and meteorite-producing ones, and whether any additional modification could be applied to improve the accuracy and extend applicability range for the proposed methodology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The product 𝑐 𝑑 𝐴 0 of the initial shape factor and the drag coefficient in Eq. 7 is often assumed to fall within the range 1.55-1.8 for a realistically shaped body (Gritsevich and Popelenskaya, 2008;Gritsevich et al, 2017;Shober et al, 2022) and equals 1.21 for an initially spherical meteoroid.…”
Section: Model Of the Ablation Of Small Meteoroidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, there is no terminal height related term in Equation 5. In this regard, Gritsevich & Popelenskaya (2008), Gritsevich, Lukashenko & Turchak (2016), and Moreno-Ibáñez et al (2015, 2017 discussed the accuracy of various simplifications of the general formulation introduced by Stulov et al (1995) to calculate the terminal height of fully ablated fireballs as well as meteorite-droppers. To match the assumptions made by Ceplecha & McCrosky (1976) (namely: no meteor deceleration, meteoroid final disintegration, constant shape, and isothermal atmosphere), the most suitable terminal height formulation simplification is the hI solution outlined in Moreno-Ibáñez et al (2015, 2017:…”
Section: Derivation Of the Criterionmentioning
confidence: 99%