2010
DOI: 10.1002/met.206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meteorological influences on the design of advanced aircraft approach procedures for reduced environmental impacts

Abstract: ABSTRACT:There is increasing interest in the development of aircraft operating procedures that reduce the environmental impacts of commercial aviation through minimization of fuel burn, emissions and noise impacts. Meteorological factors can have a major influence on the behaviour of aircraft in different phases of flight, thus they must be carefully considered in the development of any new procedures. In this paper the most important of these factors are considered (wind profiles and local pressure variations… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such measures are already being introduced by the UK National Air Traffic Services (NATS), leading to CO 2 savings of 50 000 tonnes in 2010 (NATS, 2010). Another measure is using an environmentally‐friendly flight profile, where an aircraft uses a continuous descent approach (descent at a steady rate instead of a stepped descent): these are already used at many UK airports, and can lead to small CO 2 savings (a saving of 1% fuel burn per trip) even when implemented from relatively low altitudes (Ren et al , ). Climate‐optimized routing is another possible operational measure, where flight trajectories are optimized such that the resulting aircraft emissions have the minimum climate impact, rather than minimizing the time, fuel or operating costs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such measures are already being introduced by the UK National Air Traffic Services (NATS), leading to CO 2 savings of 50 000 tonnes in 2010 (NATS, 2010). Another measure is using an environmentally‐friendly flight profile, where an aircraft uses a continuous descent approach (descent at a steady rate instead of a stepped descent): these are already used at many UK airports, and can lead to small CO 2 savings (a saving of 1% fuel burn per trip) even when implemented from relatively low altitudes (Ren et al , ). Climate‐optimized routing is another possible operational measure, where flight trajectories are optimized such that the resulting aircraft emissions have the minimum climate impact, rather than minimizing the time, fuel or operating costs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CDA (see Figure 1) allows aircraft to approach moderately dense terminal areas, eliminating the level altitude segments and their associated thrust transients at low altitude, while flying efficient, near-idle descent trajectories that save fuel, and reduce emissions and noise (Ren et al, 2011;Weitz et al, 2005). However, these procedures are not in use everywhere because effective implementation may be difficult since aircraft require special equipment and can have a negative impact on the airspace throughput and controller workload (Jackson, 2009;Reynolds et al, 2005).…”
Section: Operational Procedures For Avoiding Aircraft Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability to mitigate the last two sources strategically is limited by the stochastic and complex nature of the nonlinear models of fluid motion derived from first principles (e.g., the Navier-Stokes equations). A number of approximations and empirical studies have been carried out (see, e.g., [56][57][58][59][60]), but all compensate the lack of sufficient data and analytical solutions by assumptions about the probability densities governing the stochastic field that can describe wind accurately.…”
Section: A2 Uncertainty In the Execution Of A Control Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%