2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.pce.2009.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meteorological tsunamis on the coasts of British Columbia and Washington

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although meteotsunamis are not catastrophic to the extent of major seismically induced basin-scale events, the wave heights of meteotsunamis examined at many stations in this study were higher than those recorded during the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami. In other regions, for example, the British Columbia-Washington coast (Canada and USA) and the Bristol Channel (UK), meteotsunamis typically have small wave heights relative to the tidal range (Haslett and Bryant 2009;Thomson et al 2009). In contrast, the meteotsunamis along the south-west Australian coast, which experiences diurnal tides with a mean tidal range of *0.5 m (Pattiaratchi 2011), have wave heights equivalent to, or a factor 2 larger than, the tidal range, similar to those observed in the Mediterranean Sea.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although meteotsunamis are not catastrophic to the extent of major seismically induced basin-scale events, the wave heights of meteotsunamis examined at many stations in this study were higher than those recorded during the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami. In other regions, for example, the British Columbia-Washington coast (Canada and USA) and the Bristol Channel (UK), meteotsunamis typically have small wave heights relative to the tidal range (Haslett and Bryant 2009;Thomson et al 2009). In contrast, the meteotsunamis along the south-west Australian coast, which experiences diurnal tides with a mean tidal range of *0.5 m (Pattiaratchi 2011), have wave heights equivalent to, or a factor 2 larger than, the tidal range, similar to those observed in the Mediterranean Sea.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study systematically investigates 1-min raw sea level data over a longer time interval and over a larger area, directly benefiting from the upgrade of sea level network following the 2004 Sumatra devastating tsunami. As the tsunami network with a 1-min resolution may be found on the US West Coast as well, and high-frequency phenomena has been recorded there also (Thomson et al, 2009), it would be interesting to compare high-frequency sea level oscillations observed at the US East Coast with oscillations observed at the US West Coast. Meteorological conditions and topographical features are different along the two coasts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various observational networks are available for both atmospheric and oceanic measurements, but no standards for meteotsunami observations have yet been developed and therefore not a single network was adopted to properly capture meteotsunamis. Investigations of meteotsunamis are mainly based on standard meteorological and oceanographic networks, which mostly have insufficient accuracy and too coarse temporal resolution (e.g., 6-min NOAA CO-OPS air pressure network or 10-min regional meteoocean buoy network in the Gulf of Maine) and do not properly capture high-frequency processes at a minute timescale (Thomson et al, 2009;Šepić and Rabinovich, 2014). Some operational networks are more advanced: in particular, on the Balearic Islands (Marcos et al, 2009;Tintoré et al, 2013) and in the Adriatic Sea (Šepić and Vilibić, 2011), but they are either in the pilot-phase of development or not incorporated into a meteotsunami warning system.…”
Section: Research Gaps and Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%