2013
DOI: 10.5194/bg-10-4371-2013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methane fluxes measured by eddy covariance and static chamber techniques at a temperate forest in central Ontario, Canada

Abstract: Methane flux measurements were carried out at a temperate forest (Haliburton Forest and Wildlife Reserve) in central Ontario (45°17´11´´ N, 78°32´19´´ W) from June to October 2011. Continuous measurements were made by an off-axis integrated cavity output spectrometer that measures methane (CH4) at 10 Hz sampling rates. Fluxes were calculated from the gas measurements in conjunction with wind data collected by a 3-D sonic anemometer using the eddy covariance (EC) method. Observed methane fluxes showe… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
33
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
4
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In that case, the measurement does not significantly disturb atmospheric mixing and increased mechanical turbulence potentially enhances vertical gas exchange. Such positive correlation between the downward CH 4 flux and WS, with higher sinks during the daytime, has been reported by Wang et al (2013). This is consistent with the results of our fan-speed test, described in Koskinen et al (2014) who measured CO 2 respiration by the same chamber system.…”
Section: Diurnal Variationsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In that case, the measurement does not significantly disturb atmospheric mixing and increased mechanical turbulence potentially enhances vertical gas exchange. Such positive correlation between the downward CH 4 flux and WS, with higher sinks during the daytime, has been reported by Wang et al (2013). This is consistent with the results of our fan-speed test, described in Koskinen et al (2014) who measured CO 2 respiration by the same chamber system.…”
Section: Diurnal Variationsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In drained peatland forests, significant correlations between CH 4 flux and temperature have been found in CH 4 -emitting ecosystems (Nykänen et al, 1998;Minkkinen and Laine, 2006), although the direction of the correlation has been found to differ between fens and bogs. In contrast, no significant correlations with temperature were found in peatland forests that mainly showed CH 4 uptake (Ojanen et al, 2010;Wang et al, 2013). Both CH 4 emission and uptake have been found to correlate with WTL (e.g., Bellisario et al, 1999;Ojanen et al, 2010).…”
Section: Driving Factors For the Ch 4 Effluxmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The first experiments with our multicopter took place at the measurement site Fendt (DE-Fen) of the TERENOpreAlpine (TERrestrial ENvironmental Observatory) observatory (Zacharias et al, 2011) during the ScaleX campaign (Wolf et al, 2017) in June and July 2015. This intensive campaign aimed to address atmosphere-land surface interactions across different scales with both measurements and modeling.…”
Section: Site Description and Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The operation of towers is fixed to a certain location and the vertical information is limited to the height of the tower as well as to discrete levels at the tower. However, towers provide continuous recording of the investigated variables and are routinely used (e.g., Sasakawa et al, 2010;Wang et al, 2013;Andrews et al, 2014). With radiosondes, balloons or kites, information of meteorological conditions can be acquired for an extended vertical range, but these systems are expensive and the location of the vertical profiles is dependent on atmospheric conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the 1970s, a variety of direct or indirect experimental approaches have been used for the assessment of volatile pollutant flux to the atmosphere. Vapour fluxes can be directly measured at the soil-air interface using static flux chambers (recent examples include Wang et al 2013;Pihlatie et al 2013;Parker et al 2013a;Sihota et al 2013;Collier et al 2014;Gallego et al 2014;Happell et al 2014;Miola et al 2015) or using open or closed dynamic flux chambers (recent examples include Ma et al 2013;Parker et al 2013a;Parker et al 2013b;Sihota et al 2013;Carpi et al 2014;Liu et al 2014;Miola et al 2015). By definition, dynamic flux chambers differ from static flux chambers by the presence of a more or less high forced air flow passing through the measuring device (Hudson and Ayoko 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%