1994
DOI: 10.1029/94gl01858
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methane hydrate stability in seawater

Abstract: Experimental data are presented for methane hydrate stability conditions in seawater (S --33.5 %0). For the pressure range of 2.75-I0.0 M.Pa, at any given pressure, the dissociation temperature of m,ethane hydrate is depressed by approximately-1.1 øC relative to the pure methane-pure water system. These experimental results are consistent with previously reported thermody.namic predictions and experimental results obtained with artificial seawater.Collectively these results provide a minimum constraint concern… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

11
276
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 358 publications
(288 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
11
276
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The seawater methane hydrate stability work of Dickens and Quinby-Hunt (1994) indicates that methane hydrates in the deep Black Sea (9 1C) should be stable below 750 m. While the marine gas hydrate stability zone creates an effective geochemical barrier to upward-migrating methane, an unknown quantity of methane is able to transit the barrier (Ginsburg, 1998). Although the top clathrate boundary lies within the hydrate P-T stability field, lower methane concentrations here render this surface unstable (i.e.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The seawater methane hydrate stability work of Dickens and Quinby-Hunt (1994) indicates that methane hydrates in the deep Black Sea (9 1C) should be stable below 750 m. While the marine gas hydrate stability zone creates an effective geochemical barrier to upward-migrating methane, an unknown quantity of methane is able to transit the barrier (Ginsburg, 1998). Although the top clathrate boundary lies within the hydrate P-T stability field, lower methane concentrations here render this surface unstable (i.e.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with six different methane hydrate phase boundaries: (1) and (2) Dickens and Quinby-Hunt (1994;, (3) Distribution Coefficient Method or K vsi -Method (Sloan and Koh, 2008), (4) Moridis et al (2008), (5) Tischenko et al (2005) and (6) Lu and Sultan (2008). Water depth was converted to hydrostatic pressure assuming a constant water density of 1046 kg m 3 (Giustiniani et al, 2013).…”
Section: Volume Of the Ghszmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, rather than extrapolating this empirical fit, we use phase boundaries based on a theoretical model tuned to experimental data up to~40 MPa [14]. These curves match the data of [13], but diverge from their empirical fits by 2-3 8C in the at the temperatures and pressures of interest here (Fig. 4).…”
Section: Heat Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The empirical fit to experimental data of Dickens and Quinby-Hunt [13] is based entirely on data below 15 MPa, whereas our data come entirely from hydrostatic pressures greater than 15 MPa. Therefore, rather than extrapolating this empirical fit, we use phase boundaries based on a theoretical model tuned to experimental data up to~40 MPa [14].…”
Section: Heat Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%