2011
DOI: 10.3201/eid1706.101083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methicillin-ResistantStaphylococcus aureus, Samoa, 2007–2008

Abstract: TOC Summary: A wide range of MRSA genotypes cause wound infections.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ethical approval for the collection of isolates in Samoa was provided by the Health Research council of Samoa and written informed consent was obtained from all participants [22] . During the summer of 2007–2008, 187 S. aureus isolates were obtained from 399 people with skin and soft tissue infections presenting to clinics in towns and villages throughout Samoa.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ethical approval for the collection of isolates in Samoa was provided by the Health Research council of Samoa and written informed consent was obtained from all participants [22] . During the summer of 2007–2008, 187 S. aureus isolates were obtained from 399 people with skin and soft tissue infections presenting to clinics in towns and villages throughout Samoa.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In New Zealand, the incidence of S. aureus disease is higher among Māori and Pacific people than among people of European or other ethnicities [18] , [19] , [20] , [21] ; and available evidence suggests the incidence of disease is high in indigenous people in Pacific nations [22] . Furthermore the incidence of disease caused by community-acquired MRSA is higher in Māori, Pacific people and Aboriginal Australians than in people of European or other ethnicities [20] , [23] , [24] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are few studies on MRSA prevalence from other countries in the South West Pacific. However, one study from Samoa found an MRSA prevalence of 17%, with the majority of MRSA isolates (22/34; 64.7%) being resistant only to β‐lactam antimicrobials . In addition, a recent study from Fiji found an MRSA prevalence of 6.2% (20/323) in S. aureus skin isolates from children, with all 20 isolates being resistant only to β‐lactams and no more than one other class of antimicrobial.…”
Section: Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns Of S Aureus In the South mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First isolated in the Auckland community in 1992 from individuals who had contact with Western Samoa , this clone emerged throughout the mid‐1990s and early 2000s to become the major cause of CA‐MRSA infections throughout New Zealand, and it has subsequently been reported from several other regions, including Europe and North America . Interestingly, a study of S. aureus skin isolates from Samoa in 2007 found that ST30‐IV constituted only 12% (4/34) of MRSA, with the three most common MRSA clones being ST8‐IV (USA300) (13/34; 29%), ST93‐IV (Queensland clone) (9/34; 26%), and ST1‐IV MRSA (9/34; 26%). Like other CA‐MRSA clones, ST30‐IV harbours the lukF‐PV/lukS‐PV genes and is predominantly associated with skin infections in otherwise healthy individuals, although recent data suggest that ST30‐IV is also responsible for a sizeable proportion of MRSA infections in patients with prior healthcare exposure .…”
Section: Molecular Epidemiology Of S Aureus In the South West Pacificmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first CC30 pandemic was caused by the methicillin-sensitive phage type 80/81 clone in the 1950s and 1960s, which spread from hospitals causing a significant disease burden in the community and was characterized by resistance to penicillin and production of the Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) toxin (6)(7)(8)(9). The Southwest Pacific clone (SWP) is a contemporary PVL + community-associated MRSA clone, which has spread to several continents and which largely causes skin and soft tissue infections of otherwise healthy individuals (10,11). In contrast to phage type 80/ 81 and SWP, the EMRSA-16 (ST36) clone appears to be restricted to the hospital setting and has reduced virulence due in part to low levels of expression of cytolytic toxins (12).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%