2003
DOI: 10.2514/2.3121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Method for Designing Leading-Edge Fillets to Eliminate Flow Separation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Green and Whitesides [24] presented a similar approach, except OVERFLOW was employed to calculate the flow properties. They developed a relationship between skinfriction coefficient and turning angle to iteratively define the optimum leading-edge strake shape.…”
Section: Leading-edge Strake Design Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Green and Whitesides [24] presented a similar approach, except OVERFLOW was employed to calculate the flow properties. They developed a relationship between skinfriction coefficient and turning angle to iteratively define the optimum leading-edge strake shape.…”
Section: Leading-edge Strake Design Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One way of mitigating the junction flow is by reducing the induced pressure gradient through the employment of a leading-edge fillet. The performance and the design of LE fillets have been vastly assessed in literature, also through CFD-based methods [6,7]. Van Oudheusden et al [8] proposed a design procedure based on the combination of a panel method for the solution of the potential flow and an integral method for the solution of the approaching boundary layer on the attachment line.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is also a capability in CDISC based on the work of Green 22 that modifies a surface directly based on the difference between the current skin-friction distribution and a target distribution. Though more direct than the pressure-based constraints, this approach has been found to be much slower since more flow iterations were required per design cycle to adequately reflect the skin friction change rather than a pressure change resulting from a given geometry modification.…”
Section: Pai Design Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%