2012
DOI: 10.1364/oe.20.029854
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Method of synthesized phase objects for pattern recognition: matched filtering

Abstract: To solve the pattern recognition problem, a method of synthesized phase objects is suggested. The essence of the suggested method is that synthesized phase objects are used instead of real amplitude objects. The former is object-dependent phase distributions calculated using the iterative Fourier-transform (IFT) algorithm. The method is experimentally studied with a Vander Lugt optical-digital 4F-correlator. We present the comparative analysis of recognition results using conventional and proposed methods, est… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Curves (Figure 11a) demonstrate the above-written method for both conventional and SPO methods. As shown in [16], the SPOmethod demonstrates a faster diminution of the curve with increase in distortions (in the given case, with increase in the rotation angle), δ-like shape of a recognition signal, and higher values of SNR about 20.2 dB for the autocorrelation (Figure 12b); for the angle α = 5°, the signal is absent (Figure 13b). The curves in Figure 11b show variations in SNRs of the correlation functions with increase in the rotation angle for comparison objects for the conventional (light circles) and SPO (dark circles) methods at the Fourier-Mellin rotation invariant recognition.…”
Section: Computational Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Curves (Figure 11a) demonstrate the above-written method for both conventional and SPO methods. As shown in [16], the SPOmethod demonstrates a faster diminution of the curve with increase in distortions (in the given case, with increase in the rotation angle), δ-like shape of a recognition signal, and higher values of SNR about 20.2 dB for the autocorrelation (Figure 12b); for the angle α = 5°, the signal is absent (Figure 13b). The curves in Figure 11b show variations in SNRs of the correlation functions with increase in the rotation angle for comparison objects for the conventional (light circles) and SPO (dark circles) methods at the Fourier-Mellin rotation invariant recognition.…”
Section: Computational Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…For functions of the type φ(x, y) = exp(iϕ(x, y)) that are introduced in the objective plane of a correlator with the help of SLM, such grating is formed by means of the adding of a linear phase 2π(xu 0 + yϑ 0 ) to the phase ϕ(x, y). The spatial separation of the recognition signal and noise components in the correlation plane by the covering of a synthesized filter in the Fourier plane by a phase grating was demonstrated in [16], but the increase in SNR of the recognition signal by means of the covering of the recognition objects in the objective plane of a VL-correlator by a phase grating is made for the first time by us. The axis, relative to which the spectrum is shifted, passes through the centers of the objective and Fourier planes.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Spo And Conventional Methods Of Recognitiomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this paper, we propose a new TCAI method based on matched filtering (MF) [ 20 , 21 ] and convolutional neural network (CNN) [ 22 , 23 , 24 ]. By MF operation on the back signal, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is improved and the spike pulses corresponding to different imaging planes are divided and extracted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The possibility of optically or digitally processing the light coming from an object or from optical systems allows both studying the properties of the object itself or the developing of areas such as three-dimensional (3D) surface optical imaging [2], pattern recognition [3], and optical security [4], to mention just few of them. Optical processing systems can be divided into two categories: experimental [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] and virtual [15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%