1992
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1992.tb01859.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Method slurring: the grounded theory/phenomenology example

Abstract: Increasingly, qualitative research methods are being embraced by nurse researchers because these approaches allow exploration of human experience. Failure to explicate qualitative methodologies is resulting in a body of nursing research that is either mislabelled or is classified broadly as qualitative and subject to charges that qualitative research lacks rigour. In this paper, the authors discuss the importance of specificity in methodology and distinguish between phenomenology and grounded theory, two frequ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
325
0
8

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 460 publications
(341 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
325
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…until saturation was reached. The aim of Grounded Theory is to generate concepts, a model or a substantive theory that is faithful and illuminates the area under study rather than testing hypothesis based on existing theory (Baker, Wuerst & Stern, 1992). The basic rules include looking for psychosocial processes, discovering existing problem and examining how the people involved handle them (Stern, 1980).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…until saturation was reached. The aim of Grounded Theory is to generate concepts, a model or a substantive theory that is faithful and illuminates the area under study rather than testing hypothesis based on existing theory (Baker, Wuerst & Stern, 1992). The basic rules include looking for psychosocial processes, discovering existing problem and examining how the people involved handle them (Stern, 1980).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This qualitative research approach originated within the symbolic interactionist school of psychology (Baker, Wuest, & Stern, 1992) and it is used to generate a comprehensive theory to understand social and psychological phenomena (see Glaser & Strauss, 1994;, 1997. The research traditions used in this school of inquiry share similarities with practices employed in social constructionism and social psychology (Bryant, 2017;Strauss & Corbin, 1997).…”
Section: Grounded Theory Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The symbolic interactionist perspective assumes that people are motivated to look for meaning in their behaviour and that they act in accordance with their subjective understanding of the situations in which they find themselves. GTM is used in disciplines that aim to discover significant aspects of human experiences, and it is employed to capture, understand, and explain lived experiences of people (Baker et al, 1992;Charmaz, 1996). GTM provides researchers with a series of logically consistent research techniques and strategies to conduct rigorous qualitative research studies.…”
Section: Grounded Theory Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with phenomenological methodology, only data that was from participants who lived the experiences was considered (Ray, 1985;Van Manen, 1984, 1997. This approach would allow researchers to examine responses that emerged from the participants' own frame of reference (Baker, Wuest, & Stern, 1992) and identify aspects of the participants' dialectic relationship between self and his/her world.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%