2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.compind.2016.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Method to reduce the gap between construction and IT companies to improve suitability before selecting an enterprise system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most previous studies that analyzed the factors of ES system implementation success (Ahmad, Pinedo Cuenca 2013;Chou, Chang 2008;Ha, Ahn 2014;Hsu et al 2015;Li et al 2017;Nagpal et al 2017;Nwankpa 2015;Ram et al 2013;Ruivo et al 2014;Soja 2009;Zhu et al 2010) and the causality between ES implementation and its effect (Anderson et al 2011;Badescu, Garcés-Ayerbe 2009;Galy, Sauceda 2014;Holsapple et al 2017;Hu, Quan 2005;Livermore, Rippa 2011;Lu, Jinghua 2012;Nicolaou, Bhattacharya 2006;Ranjan et al 2017;Swierczek, Shrestha 2003;Uwizeyemungu, Raymond 2012) proposed quantitative methods to analyze the effect of an ES after its implementation (Chang et al 2011;Chen et al 2006;Holsapple, Sena 2001;Lemonakis et al 2018;Parthasarathy, Sharma 2016;Shao, Lin 2002;Usmanij et al 2013;Uwizeyemungu, Raymond 2009;Wei 2008) and analyzed the possibility for success of ES (Chang et al 2012;Hadidi et al 2017;Hakim, A., Hakim, H. 2010;Ibrahim et al 2018;Lee, C., Lee, C. 2017;Parhizkar, Comuzzi 2017;Parthasarathy, Sharma 2017;<...>…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most previous studies that analyzed the factors of ES system implementation success (Ahmad, Pinedo Cuenca 2013;Chou, Chang 2008;Ha, Ahn 2014;Hsu et al 2015;Li et al 2017;Nagpal et al 2017;Nwankpa 2015;Ram et al 2013;Ruivo et al 2014;Soja 2009;Zhu et al 2010) and the causality between ES implementation and its effect (Anderson et al 2011;Badescu, Garcés-Ayerbe 2009;Galy, Sauceda 2014;Holsapple et al 2017;Hu, Quan 2005;Livermore, Rippa 2011;Lu, Jinghua 2012;Nicolaou, Bhattacharya 2006;Ranjan et al 2017;Swierczek, Shrestha 2003;Uwizeyemungu, Raymond 2012) proposed quantitative methods to analyze the effect of an ES after its implementation (Chang et al 2011;Chen et al 2006;Holsapple, Sena 2001;Lemonakis et al 2018;Parthasarathy, Sharma 2016;Shao, Lin 2002;Usmanij et al 2013;Uwizeyemungu, Raymond 2009;Wei 2008) and analyzed the possibility for success of ES (Chang et al 2012;Hadidi et al 2017;Hakim, A., Hakim, H. 2010;Ibrahim et al 2018;Lee, C., Lee, C. 2017;Parhizkar, Comuzzi 2017;Parthasarathy, Sharma 2017;<...>…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many previous studies proposed success factors and strategies to ensure efficiency when investing in enterprise system (ES) implementation (Mamoghli et al 2015;Ngai et al 2008), but few previous studies proposed a method to analyze the effect of IT implementation. ES is the type of customized IT system for requirements and unique processes of company (Lee, C., Lee, C. 2017). Rather, previous studies proposed a method to analyze the effect after ES was implemented, but not before (Chen et al 2006;Shao, Lin 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, collecting the productivity data for each activity is difficult because the construction project is separated between the head office and the construction site. The application of consistent productivity is also difficult because the characteristics of each construction site are different (Lee and Lee, 2017). Thus, this study derives the influence factors on productivity and analyzes the influence level of the factors on each activity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%