2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.04.094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methodical thermodynamic analysis and regression models of organic Rankine cycle architectures for waste heat recovery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The net power output is reduced from 1130 kWe (Case 1) to 989 kWe which corresponds with a relative decrease of 12.6%. The higher net power output from a PEORC is also confirmed in literature; in these temperature ranges, the expected increase would be around 10% [58]. Again, care should be taken with these results, as the same pump and expander efficiencies are assumed for both the SCORC and PEORC cycle architectures.…”
Section: Simulation Results For the Five Investigated Casessupporting
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The net power output is reduced from 1130 kWe (Case 1) to 989 kWe which corresponds with a relative decrease of 12.6%. The higher net power output from a PEORC is also confirmed in literature; in these temperature ranges, the expected increase would be around 10% [58]. Again, care should be taken with these results, as the same pump and expander efficiencies are assumed for both the SCORC and PEORC cycle architectures.…”
Section: Simulation Results For the Five Investigated Casessupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Also, the decrease in net electricity output is low. This is a specific result which has been generalized in previous work [58]. If there is a restriction on the condenser temperature, alternative cycles like …”
Section: Comparison Of Cases With and Without Combined Heatingmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The overall thermal efficiency, the exergy efficiency of heating and condensation, the system exergy efficiency of the designed SORC were all higher than a pure R134a subcritical ORC. Lecompte et al studied the cycle performance of 67 refrigerants for both subcritical ORC and transcritical ORC. Results showed that the transcritical ORC outperforms the subcritical ORC in second law efficiency by up to 10.8%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the benefits of the supercritical ORC are dependent on the types of heat, working fluids, operating conditions and cycle configuration used. Lecompt et al [7] showed that the second law efficiency of a supercritical cycle for low temperature waste heat recovery is 10.8% more than a subcritical cycle. Chen et al [8] showed that a supercritical ORC with a zeotropic mixture as the working fluid can improve the thermal efficiency by 10%-30% more than the subcritical ORC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%