A very large number of experimental studies in aquatic ecotoxicology have been devoted to the assessment of metal uptake in different classes of living organisms. Most of them are based on analysis of single toxicants, despite the fact that under field conditions the biota is generally exposed to multicontaminant pollution. In addition to producing a direct response in biota, a toxic metal can also act by interfering with other metal ions or elements. Thus, the concurrent presence of two or more metallic contaminants in the organism often yields metal uptake that deviates from those currently observed for individual metals. If the effect is an enhancement of bioaccumulation, it is said to be synergistic. If the effect is a decrease of metal incorporation, it is said to be antagonistic.Most of the knowledge about metal-metal interactions has been acquired in mammalian species. In such species, the major source of metals is the diet and metal uptake depends on the physicochemical forms of storage of metals in food organisms (Amiard-Triquet et al., 1993;Dallinger, 1993). In these conditions, interactions occur inside the organism and changes may be expected at the level of toxicant uptake, distribution, storage and excretion. Biochemical processes such as competitive affinities for intracellular ligands or co-accumulation as mineral granules are probably predominant. In the case of aquatic organisms, interactions can occur both inside organisms (as in mammals) as well as outside through changes of metal speciation, distribution between soluble and insoluble phases and finally bioavailability. Great differences have been detected in metal body burdens when different species (or even different populations within the same species) were compared (Rainbow, 1993). If the species or populations that accumulate the most are Metal Metabolism in Aquatic Environments. Edited