2020 11th International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/icccnt49239.2020.9225673
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methodologies and Techniques for Heart Disease Classification and Prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Results concluded that AdaBoost gives almost the same accuracy (89%) at test sizes 40% and 10% of the model. Sangle et al [13] analyzed the theoretical aspect of different work in the field of ML and Deep Learning (DL) for the prediction of Cardiovascular Disease. They have studied the pros/cons of techniques like DT, k-NN, SVM, NB, ANN, and Ensemble Learning.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Results concluded that AdaBoost gives almost the same accuracy (89%) at test sizes 40% and 10% of the model. Sangle et al [13] analyzed the theoretical aspect of different work in the field of ML and Deep Learning (DL) for the prediction of Cardiovascular Disease. They have studied the pros/cons of techniques like DT, k-NN, SVM, NB, ANN, and Ensemble Learning.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An experiment was carried out on R Studio and the result concluded that HRFLM produced better accuracy (88.47%) than other classifiers. [6], [17], [19], [7]- [11], [13], [14], [16] 11 NB [7], [8], [10], [11], [13], [14], [16], [18], [20] 9…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation