2016
DOI: 10.1117/1.jmm.15.4.044001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methodology for determining critical dimension scanning electron microscope measurement condition of sub-20 nm resist patterns for 0.33 NA extreme ultraviolet lithography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The acceleration voltage is significantly higher than that of conventional CD SEM for resist pattern in which acceleration voltage lower than 1 kV is generally used to reduce resist shrinkage. [49][50][51] Although PS, which is a similar material to conventional KrF resist, is much tolerant of EB irradiation compared with conventional ArF resist, we actually observed the hole diameter increased around 3 nm due to PS shrinkage during 10 times measurement. However, the impact of the hole size variation on the image placement evaluation may be negligible because the size is considered to be isotopically changed.…”
Section: Drop Pattern Modificationmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The acceleration voltage is significantly higher than that of conventional CD SEM for resist pattern in which acceleration voltage lower than 1 kV is generally used to reduce resist shrinkage. [49][50][51] Although PS, which is a similar material to conventional KrF resist, is much tolerant of EB irradiation compared with conventional ArF resist, we actually observed the hole diameter increased around 3 nm due to PS shrinkage during 10 times measurement. However, the impact of the hole size variation on the image placement evaluation may be negligible because the size is considered to be isotopically changed.…”
Section: Drop Pattern Modificationmentioning
confidence: 66%