2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14913.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods and results of an automatic analysis of a complete sample ofSwift-XRT observations of GRBs

Abstract: We present a homogeneous X-ray analysis of all 318 gamma-ray bursts detected by the X-ray telescope (XRT) on the Swift satellite up to 2008 July 23; this represents the largest sample of X-ray GRB data published to date. In Sections 2-3, we detail the methods which the Swift-XRT team has developed to produce the enhanced positions, light curves, hardness ratios and spectra presented in this paper. Software using these methods continues to create such products for all new GRBs observed by the Swift-XRT. We also… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

34
1,227
2
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,566 publications
(1,269 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
34
1,227
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…1, together with the monitoring observations provided by Swift/XRT (0.5-10 keV). The latter data were retrieved from the Leicester University on-line analysis tool (Evans et al 2009) and used only to compare the monitoring provided by the Swift and IN-TEGRAL satellites. We refer the reader to Tetarenko et al (2016) for more details on the Swift data and the corresponding analysis.…”
Section: Integralmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1, together with the monitoring observations provided by Swift/XRT (0.5-10 keV). The latter data were retrieved from the Leicester University on-line analysis tool (Evans et al 2009) and used only to compare the monitoring provided by the Swift and IN-TEGRAL satellites. We refer the reader to Tetarenko et al (2016) for more details on the Swift data and the corresponding analysis.…”
Section: Integralmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 XRT continued observing the afterglow for 4.7 days in photon counting mode. We extract XRT PC-mode spectra using the online tool on the Swift website (Evans et al 2007(Evans et al , 2009. 10 We downloaded the event and response files generated by the online tool in these time bins, and fit them using the HEASOFT (v6.19) software package and corresponding calibration files.…”
Section: Grb Properties and Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas the rapid response of Swift has yielded prompt X-ray afterglow localization and rich X-ray light curves, and ground-based facilities have improved the detection and characterization of optical light curves (Nousek et al 2006;Liang et al 2007Liang et al , 2008Evans et al 2009;Margutti et al 2013;Zaninoni et al 2013), detailed observations of afterglows in the radio and millimeter have resulted in a low detection rate of about 30%, with sensitivity being the primary challenge (Chandra & Frail 2012;de Ugarte Postigo et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another important phenomenon observed by Swift/XRT is the jet break of X-ray afterglow at late time. We use the light curve analysis result from UK Swift Science Data Centre, in which the jet break time is determined to be 1.8 ± 0.5 × 10 6 s (Evans et al 2007(Evans et al , 2009). With the isotropic Energy E γ and the jet break time t j , the half-opening angle of the jet can be estimated by (Sari & Piran 1999;Frail et al 2001):…”
Section: Information From the Afterglowmentioning
confidence: 99%