2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7683(00)00157-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods for dimension reduction and their application in nonlinear dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
92
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
92
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Many different methods have been proposed in the past, one of the most popular being the Proper Orthogonal Decomposition (POD) method [3][4][5]29]. In this paper, the NNMs of the unforced structure are tested as basis functions for reducing the dynamics for shell models with harmonic forcing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many different methods have been proposed in the past, one of the most popular being the Proper Orthogonal Decomposition (POD) method [3][4][5]29]. In this paper, the NNMs of the unforced structure are tested as basis functions for reducing the dynamics for shell models with harmonic forcing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, improving the reduced dynamics requires adding more modes/basis vectors (and hence dimensions) to the reduced space, even though there may be no geometric reason to do so. Methods that attempt to describe the nonlinear inverse are called nonlinear Galerkin methods, or approximate inertial manifolds [32,43].…”
Section: Galerkin Projectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 It turns out that while C is self-adjoint, K is not self-adjoint because of the presence of the follower force µ. The adjoint (or left) eigenvalue problem therefore reads:…”
Section: Right and Left Eigenvalue Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The three displacements, however, are not independent because of the internal constraints: sin ϑ = u ; ε := (1 + w ) 2 + u 2 − 1 = 0 (1) expressing shear-undeformability and inextensibility, respectively. The curvature κ(s) is assumed as the (unique) strain measure; from Equation (1 1 ) it follows that…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%