2018
DOI: 10.1155/2018/8478471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods for Extraction of Muscle Proteins from Meat and Fish Using Denaturing and Nondenaturing Solutions

Abstract: The objective of the present study was to test two extraction methods including solutions with different ionic strengths on the extraction and separation of the myofibrillar proteins from meat and fish muscles of different species. Meat samples from longissimus thoracis muscle of beef and lamb, pectoralis major muscle of chicken, and dorsal white muscle of fish from sole (Solea solea), European hake (Merluccius merluccius), and sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) were analyzed. The extraction method using nondenat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, samples of gastrocnemius muscle were subjected to three sequential extractions, each one being analyzed by LC-MS/MS. In particular, phosphate buffer saline (PBS) was used to solubilize hydrophilic proteins (PBS extract), and then the insoluble part was treated with a combination of urea (U) and thiourea (T) to extract hydrophobic molecules such as membrane proteins, myofibrillar, and part of ECM proteins (U/T extract) [ 31 ]. Finally, the remaining insoluble fraction was treated with guanidine-HCl (GuHCl extract), one of the most efficient chaotropic agents which is known to extract poorly soluble, heavily cross-linked proteins, and proteoglycans.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, samples of gastrocnemius muscle were subjected to three sequential extractions, each one being analyzed by LC-MS/MS. In particular, phosphate buffer saline (PBS) was used to solubilize hydrophilic proteins (PBS extract), and then the insoluble part was treated with a combination of urea (U) and thiourea (T) to extract hydrophobic molecules such as membrane proteins, myofibrillar, and part of ECM proteins (U/T extract) [ 31 ]. Finally, the remaining insoluble fraction was treated with guanidine-HCl (GuHCl extract), one of the most efficient chaotropic agents which is known to extract poorly soluble, heavily cross-linked proteins, and proteoglycans.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following general settings were used: curtain gas, 30 psi; ion source gas (1), 50 psi; ion source gas (2), 55 psi; temperature 550 °C; and ion spray voltage, 5500 V. We developed a precision analysis method using LC/MS/MS to measure the myl3 concentration in beef samples as a quality test for dry aging. Myofibrillar proteins, mainly myosin and actin, are the primary components of the skeletal muscle [17]. We hypothe- We developed a precision analysis method using LC/MS/MS to measure the myl3 concentration in beef samples as a quality test for dry aging.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We hypothe- We developed a precision analysis method using LC/MS/MS to measure the myl3 concentration in beef samples as a quality test for dry aging. Myofibrillar proteins, mainly myosin and actin, are the primary components of the skeletal muscle [17]. We hypothesized that myosin isolated from muscle skeletal protein is related to beef tenderness.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is particularly true as the samples with the highest concentrations: T080 (20% w/w chicken) and B080 (20% w/w pork) always gave the best classification accuracy whereas, those with the lowest concentration T099 (1% w / w chicken) and B099 (1% w / w pork) consistently gave the worst. Extraction of meat compounds often involve using denaturing or nondenaturing solutions which, can be expensive [ 49 ]. As observed for the determination of optimal dilution, better accuracies could be achieved with this method for meat mixtures with higher adulterant ranges and when 1% w / w of mixture combination was not included.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%