2010
DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncq081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods of determining the effective dose in dental radiology

Abstract: A wide variety of X-ray equipment is used today in dental radiology, including intra-oral, orthopantomographic, cephalometric, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and computed tomography (CT). This raises the question of how the radiation risks resulting from different kinds of examinations should be compared. The risk to the patient is usually expressed in terms of effective dose. However, it is difficult to determine its reliability, and it is difficult to make comparisons, especially when different modalit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…All of them include assumptions, which result in limitations and uncertainties. 20 The effective dose corresponds to the risk that also a uniformly distributed dose with the same value in the whole body would represent. It gives a general indication of the level of risk for the X-ray examination in question.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of them include assumptions, which result in limitations and uncertainties. 20 The effective dose corresponds to the risk that also a uniformly distributed dose with the same value in the whole body would represent. It gives a general indication of the level of risk for the X-ray examination in question.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, a comparison with other studies is often difficult because of the use of different dosemeters, measuring locations, phantoms or methodologies. 17 For example, a study by Palomo et al is based on ten TLDs for each measurement, 18 whereas measurements by Pauwels et al are based on 147 and 152 TLDs (for two different phantoms). 19 In conclusion, a more standardized approach would produce relief, especially for the user responsible for finding a radiation exposure as low as reasonably achievable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the compounds used in TLDs include lithium fluoride (LiF), CaSO 4 (calcium sulfate) and CaF 2 (calcium fluoride). 1,6 Radiographic examination is an important component of the diagnostic process in dentistry; still, the possible deleterious effects of ionizing radiation on biological tissues must not be ignored. Digital systems are gradually replacing conventional radiographic films with the advantages of lower radiation doses, as well as time-and storage-saving properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%