2002
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2002.tb02517.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods to Determine Storativity of Infinite Confined Aquifers from a Recovery Test

Abstract: Starting from the equations of Theis and Cooper-Jacob, two new mathematical methods are proposed for interpreting the residual drawdown data for an infinite confined aquifer. Under Theis' assumptions and using the Cooper-Jacob approximation, the principal aquifer characteristics of transmissivity, pumping storativity, and recovery storativity are expressed without any correction or additional assumption. An actual case is used for illustration and confirms the validity of proposed equations and methods.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All methods listed in Table 1 gave comparable results, which does not enable us to differentiate the performance of these methods. However, the unique features of our approach become obvious when we compare the straight‐line plot in Figure 1 with straight‐line fitting reported by others, e.g., Chenaf and Chapuis (2002, Figures 2 to 5) and Samani and Pasandi (2003, Figure 5b). In our Figure 1, all the points transformed from the recovery data fall onto a straight line nicely except for a couple of late time points, which may be due to measurement errors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…All methods listed in Table 1 gave comparable results, which does not enable us to differentiate the performance of these methods. However, the unique features of our approach become obvious when we compare the straight‐line plot in Figure 1 with straight‐line fitting reported by others, e.g., Chenaf and Chapuis (2002, Figures 2 to 5) and Samani and Pasandi (2003, Figure 5b). In our Figure 1, all the points transformed from the recovery data fall onto a straight line nicely except for a couple of late time points, which may be due to measurement errors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…All other plots reported in Table 1 showed deviation from a straight‐line fit for early‐time data. In fact, both Chenaf and Chapuis (2002) and Samani and Pasandi (2003) adopted the Cooper‐Jacob approximation to arrive at linear relations that require both u 1 and u 2 to be no more than 0.01. For the application described in the previous section, we plotted the values of u 1 and u 2 vs. the corresponding t ′ in a semilog graph (Figure 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The same set of data has been analysed by other authors including Ballukaraya and Sharma (1991), Singh (1999), Chenaf and Chapuis (2002), Singh (2003), Zheng et al (2005) and Singh (2006). The residual drawdowns were measured in an observation well located 30 .…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%