2012
DOI: 10.4103/2277-9175.105169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methylation pattern of SFRP1 promoter in stool sample is a potential marker for early detection of colorectal cancer

Abstract: Background:To setup a non-invasive genetic screening method for colorectal cancer, we evaluated the promoter methylation status of secreted frizzled-related protein1 (sfrp1) in stool samples of colorectal cancer with respect to a series of healthy individuals, using methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction.Materials and Methods:In stool samples from 25 patients with colorectal cancer and 25 healthy control subjects, isolated DNA was treated with sodium bisulfite and analyzed by methylation-specific polym… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The frequency of SFRP1 gene promoter methylation in our patients was 72.2%. Previous studies, have shown a frequency ranging from 52-95% in colorectal cancer (Rawson et al, 2011;Barták, 2017;Zhou et al, 2015;Meng et al, 2011;Dallol et al, 2012;Salehi et al, 2012). In present study we noted a slightly higher incidence of hypermethylation of SFRP1 in male patients than females (75.8% vs. 66.7%), however this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.54).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…The frequency of SFRP1 gene promoter methylation in our patients was 72.2%. Previous studies, have shown a frequency ranging from 52-95% in colorectal cancer (Rawson et al, 2011;Barták, 2017;Zhou et al, 2015;Meng et al, 2011;Dallol et al, 2012;Salehi et al, 2012). In present study we noted a slightly higher incidence of hypermethylation of SFRP1 in male patients than females (75.8% vs. 66.7%), however this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.54).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…Wnt signaling pathway acts as an oncogenic way that aberrant activation of the Wnt pathway may give rise to the variety of human cancers, especially in CRC. SFRP2 gene, an important member of the SFRP family, functions as a negative regulator of the oncogenic Wnt pathway through competing with frizzled membrane-bound receptors that can use it as an appropriate marker in CRCs screening 9. Mόller et al 24.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, FOBT screening decreases only CRC mortality but not the incidence of CRC, and it is not able to detect precursor lesions 78. Colonoscopy is an invasive method that causes adverse effects including postpolypectomy bleeding and perforation;8 for this reason, the primary goal is to identify useful screening tools such that it could increase the sensitivity and specificity of screening without invasive actions 89. Molecular and genetic study can play a key role in the detection of CRC because genetic alterations are the main causes of colorectal neoplasia 10.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Epigenetic SFRP1 inactivation is linked to the upregulation of Wnt / β-catenin cascade in CRC; Wnt / β-catenin repression has also been considered a mechanism that inhibits tumor cell growth and prevents metastatic invasion ( Figure 1 ) 22 . SFPR2 and SFRP1 methylation in stool also exnibits high sensitivity and specificity for CRC detection 26-40 . SFRP2 methylation for CRC identification in stool samples reaches a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 77% 31 .…”
Section: Multiple Dna Methylation Biomarkersmentioning
confidence: 96%