Abstract:Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to argue that the myriad social forces in El Salvador make it difficult for LGBTQ+ to publicly declare their sexual orientation or name their perpetrators and hence to use the #MeToo hashtag as a leadership strategy of their movement.
Design/methodology/approach
A qualitative research design was used that included interviews and focus group discussions with LGBTQ+ leaders of organizations and government officials. A descriptive/interpretive approach was used to understand… Show more
“…Due to technological developments, (social) media have become another sub‐area within coming out research. For example, research explored and critically reflected on LGBTQ+ individuals' coming out negotiation to family, friends, work colleagues, and strangers via Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, blogs, and online dating platforms (e.g., Chester et al., 2016; Duguay, 2016; Etengoff & Daiute, 2015; George, 2011; Onanuga, 2021; Owens, 2017; Phua, 2020; Steinfeld, 2020; Thompson & Figueroa, 2020; Waggoner, 2022) or on reality TV shows (e.g., Bannink & Wentink, 2015; Boross & Reijnders, 2015, 2017). The analysis of celebrities' coming out and related press coverage has been also of interest (e.g., Benozzo, 2013; Motschenbacher, 2019; Schallhorn & Hempel, 2017; Tinker, 2021).…”
Section: Three‐lens Typologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Countries of all inhabited continents are represented within my ‘coming out’ search findings (peer‐reviewed articles or academic books, published in English). For example, in order of their publication date: North America (United States [e.g., Dank, 1971; Fankhanel, 2010; Herdt, 1989; Li & Samp, 2021a; Pastrana et al., 2017; Trahan & Goodrich, 2015), Mexico (e.g., Carrier, 1989), Canada (e.g., Brotman et al., 2002; Kahn & Alessi, 2018), Jamaica (e.g., White et al., 2016), El Salvador (e.g., Thompson & Figueroa, 2020)), Europe (Germany (e.g., Barglowski et al., 2018; Götz & Blanz, 2020; Schafer, 1976), United Kingdom (e.g., Almack, 2007; Clarke & Earley, 2021; Humphrey, 1999; Nordqvist & Smart, 2014; Weeks, 1977), Ireland (e.g., Daly et al., 2020; Neary, 2013; Ryan, 2003; Sharek et al., 2015), Austria (e.g., Bunzl, 2005), Netherlands (e.g., Bannink & Wentink, 2015; Brand, 2005; Maliepaard, 2018), Norway (e.g., Hegna, 2007; Malterud & Bjorkman, 2016), France (e.g., Charbonnier & Graziani, 2016; Provencher, 2011), Hungary (e.g., Béres‐Deák, 2011), Malta (e.g., Bradford & Clark, 2011), Italy (e.g., Benozzo, 2013; Pieri, 2021; Pistella et al., 2020), Portugal (e.g., Costa et al., 2013; Gato et al., 2020; Torres & Rodrigues, 2021), Slovenia (e.g., Kuhar & Švab, 2014; Švab, 2016), Belgium (e.g., Haxhe & D’Amore, 2014), Spain (e.g., de Miguel et al., 2018; Vilanova et al., 2020), Poland (e.g., Barglowski et al., 2018), Romania (e.g., Haxhe et al., 2018), Turkey (e.g., Barglowski et al., 2018…”
Coming out is a fast-growing global research area with numerous interdisciplinary publications dedicated to its exploration. To contribute to a more organised and concise way of understanding this rapidly expanding field, I introduce a three-lens typology. Based on the systematic categorisation of over 700 publications, coming out research can be viewed via the following three lenses: (1) the different social institutions in which individuals come out, (2) to whom individuals come out, and (3) the content of individuals' coming out. The identified lenses focus on 'coming out in', 'coming out to' and 'coming out as', which adds to current conceptual understandings of 'coming out into' and 'coming out of'. Further, lens 3 demonstrates another usage shift of the coming out terminology. The concept of coming out originally was used outside of sexuality contexts and currently is being used more broadly again. However, in contrast to its original meaning, the new areas of application (e.g., fatness, atheism, illness) are still linked to conceptualisations and experiences of non-normativity. This publication assists students, scholars, and practitioners with navigating the extensive amount of coming out literature. It further illustrates the potential and challenges of coming out research and points towards the future-the if, how and what-of this field.
“…Due to technological developments, (social) media have become another sub‐area within coming out research. For example, research explored and critically reflected on LGBTQ+ individuals' coming out negotiation to family, friends, work colleagues, and strangers via Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, blogs, and online dating platforms (e.g., Chester et al., 2016; Duguay, 2016; Etengoff & Daiute, 2015; George, 2011; Onanuga, 2021; Owens, 2017; Phua, 2020; Steinfeld, 2020; Thompson & Figueroa, 2020; Waggoner, 2022) or on reality TV shows (e.g., Bannink & Wentink, 2015; Boross & Reijnders, 2015, 2017). The analysis of celebrities' coming out and related press coverage has been also of interest (e.g., Benozzo, 2013; Motschenbacher, 2019; Schallhorn & Hempel, 2017; Tinker, 2021).…”
Section: Three‐lens Typologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Countries of all inhabited continents are represented within my ‘coming out’ search findings (peer‐reviewed articles or academic books, published in English). For example, in order of their publication date: North America (United States [e.g., Dank, 1971; Fankhanel, 2010; Herdt, 1989; Li & Samp, 2021a; Pastrana et al., 2017; Trahan & Goodrich, 2015), Mexico (e.g., Carrier, 1989), Canada (e.g., Brotman et al., 2002; Kahn & Alessi, 2018), Jamaica (e.g., White et al., 2016), El Salvador (e.g., Thompson & Figueroa, 2020)), Europe (Germany (e.g., Barglowski et al., 2018; Götz & Blanz, 2020; Schafer, 1976), United Kingdom (e.g., Almack, 2007; Clarke & Earley, 2021; Humphrey, 1999; Nordqvist & Smart, 2014; Weeks, 1977), Ireland (e.g., Daly et al., 2020; Neary, 2013; Ryan, 2003; Sharek et al., 2015), Austria (e.g., Bunzl, 2005), Netherlands (e.g., Bannink & Wentink, 2015; Brand, 2005; Maliepaard, 2018), Norway (e.g., Hegna, 2007; Malterud & Bjorkman, 2016), France (e.g., Charbonnier & Graziani, 2016; Provencher, 2011), Hungary (e.g., Béres‐Deák, 2011), Malta (e.g., Bradford & Clark, 2011), Italy (e.g., Benozzo, 2013; Pieri, 2021; Pistella et al., 2020), Portugal (e.g., Costa et al., 2013; Gato et al., 2020; Torres & Rodrigues, 2021), Slovenia (e.g., Kuhar & Švab, 2014; Švab, 2016), Belgium (e.g., Haxhe & D’Amore, 2014), Spain (e.g., de Miguel et al., 2018; Vilanova et al., 2020), Poland (e.g., Barglowski et al., 2018), Romania (e.g., Haxhe et al., 2018), Turkey (e.g., Barglowski et al., 2018…”
Coming out is a fast-growing global research area with numerous interdisciplinary publications dedicated to its exploration. To contribute to a more organised and concise way of understanding this rapidly expanding field, I introduce a three-lens typology. Based on the systematic categorisation of over 700 publications, coming out research can be viewed via the following three lenses: (1) the different social institutions in which individuals come out, (2) to whom individuals come out, and (3) the content of individuals' coming out. The identified lenses focus on 'coming out in', 'coming out to' and 'coming out as', which adds to current conceptual understandings of 'coming out into' and 'coming out of'. Further, lens 3 demonstrates another usage shift of the coming out terminology. The concept of coming out originally was used outside of sexuality contexts and currently is being used more broadly again. However, in contrast to its original meaning, the new areas of application (e.g., fatness, atheism, illness) are still linked to conceptualisations and experiences of non-normativity. This publication assists students, scholars, and practitioners with navigating the extensive amount of coming out literature. It further illustrates the potential and challenges of coming out research and points towards the future-the if, how and what-of this field.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.