2014
DOI: 10.1109/tcsvt.2013.2291283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metric Learning Based Structural Appearance Model for Robust Visual Tracking

Abstract: Appearance modeling is a key issue for the success of a visual tracker. Sparse representation based appearance modeling has received an increasing amount of interest in recent years. However, most of existing work utilizes reconstruction errors to compute the observation likelihood under the generative framework, which may give poor performance, especially for significant appearance variations. In this paper, we advocate an approach to visual tracking that seeks an appropriate metric in the feature space of sp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A total of 12 different initialisations and 20 different segments are evaluated for SRE and STE, respectively. We evaluate the proposed tracker against nine state-of-the-art tracking algorithms including ALSA [6], VTD [38], SCM [39], Struck [23], TLD [20], latent structural part-based tracker (LSPT) [22], metric learning based structural appearance model (MLSAM) [40], color names (CN) [41], and online non-negative dictionary learning tracker (ONNDL) [42]. Fig.…”
Section: Robustness To Initialisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 12 different initialisations and 20 different segments are evaluated for SRE and STE, respectively. We evaluate the proposed tracker against nine state-of-the-art tracking algorithms including ALSA [6], VTD [38], SCM [39], Struck [23], TLD [20], latent structural part-based tracker (LSPT) [22], metric learning based structural appearance model (MLSAM) [40], color names (CN) [41], and online non-negative dictionary learning tracker (ONNDL) [42]. Fig.…”
Section: Robustness To Initialisationmentioning
confidence: 99%