2021
DOI: 10.1080/23251042.2021.1975349
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metropolitan air pollution abatement and industrial growth: Global urban panel analysis of PM10, PM2.5, NO2 and SO2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2022) and Leffel et al. (2022) all underlined industrialization's harmful effects on air quality and ecology.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(2022) and Leffel et al. (2022) all underlined industrialization's harmful effects on air quality and ecology.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Urbanization, automation and population increase in transitional economies have degraded air quality. He et al (2022), Li, Wang et al (2022) and Leffel et al (2022) all underlined industrialization's harmful effects on air quality and ecology.…”
Section: Ardl Bounds Estimates and Ekc Turning Pointmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To realize the current situation of air pollution in Lahore, the PM 2.5 concentration data were obtained as well as evaluated (WHO standard PM 2.5 concentrations ~25 µg/m 3 ). The industrial growth, traffic, and seasonal changes were the main contributing factors to indoor pollution [50,51]. During winter and post-monsoon season in Lahore, the high PM concentrations have been observed due to the excessive burning of plant residues [52].…”
Section: Indoor Particulate Matter and Dust Ingestionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a growing number of scholars believe that povertystricken policies should take into account environmental effects and give due consideration to the elimination of multidimensional poverty as a way to promote sustainable development strategies (Brooks et al, 2012;Leffel et al, 2022;Porras and Asquith, 2018). For example, Barbier argues that emissions reduction policy may affect economic development for poverty reduction and that there is a need to assess how the design and implementation of emissions reduction policy affect the potential trade-offs between positive and negative impacts on poverty reduction and to study emissions reduction and poverty reduction together (Barbier, 2014); Howe argues that there are complex interlinkages between ecology and poverty and that it is important to develop policy in these areas recognize the importance of these linkages and study them together (Howe et al, 2013); Meijaard argues that previous studies have focused on the environmental outcomes of policy and ignored their economic consequences, and that there is now a need to focus on the impact of policy on both poverty reduction and environmental protection outcomes (Meijaard et al, 2020); Brashares argues that poverty is a key constraint on environmental protection, that poverty must be addressed to achieve environmental protection goals, and that environmental Frontiers in Environmental Science frontiersin.org protection activities must not undermine poverty reduction, so that environment and poverty need to be studied in a unified framework (Brashares et al, 2004); Huang argues that scholars should not only focus on the poverty alleviation effects of policy, but also on the multidimensional improvement effects of policy, and that the assessment of policy should be comprehensive (F. B.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%