Mewujudkan Keadilan Sosial dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Di Pengadilan Administrasi

Abstract

Administrative Courts in developing countries carry out more demanding tasks than those in developed countries because they have to be able to keep the balance between protecting public and individual interests. This research raises the issue of how to realize social justice in resolving a dispute in Administrative Courts. This is a doctrinal research using legal, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The research result indicates that Administrative Courts, carry out the oversight function against the acts of government officials, have to realize the justice which becomes the essence of the administrative law's goal, that is social justice. Social justice which is built on the basis of Pancasila, functions to maintain the balance between the individual interest and the society's rights so that the balance and harmony between the government and the people will be created. Furthermore, the Administrative Courts have to be able to realize the social justice, not only normative or procedural justices.

Pertanggung Jawaban Hukum Pihak Ekspedisi Pengiriman Terhadap Barang Hilang atau Rusak

“…Beberapa sistem peradilan memiliki prosedur yang kompleks dan formal, yang membutuhkan waktu dan upaya yang signifikan untuk menyelesaikan sengketa. Ketika prosedur peradilan terlalu rumit, ini dapat memperlambat proses dan menyebabkan kebingungan bagi pihak yang terlibat dalam sengketa (Amarini, 2016).…”

Peran Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Menegakkan Prinsip Kepentingan Umum

“…Pendapat lain menurut S.F. Marbun dalam Amarini pada tahun 2018, dalam sudut pandang teoritis tujuan pembentukan PTUN yaitu agar memberikan penjagaan atas hak-hak individu serta hakhak warga negara agar tercipta kecocokan, kesejajaran, dan sejalan dengan keperluan yang individu butuhkan dengan kepentingan umum serta kepentingan masyarakat (Amarini, 2018). Dengan kata lain, PTUN hadir ISSN: 2808-6988…”

Criminal Act Of Travel Document Fraud Reviewed Based On Law Number 6 Year 2011 On Immigration

“…In general, the case settlement process in the context of Indonesian society is known by two patterns, namely the litigation pattern and the non-litigation settlement pattern. The pattern of litigation settlement is identical to the settlement of a case using legal instruments provided by the state through the courts (Amarini, 2016). The projusticia process is more directed to law enforcement by using law enforcement in accordance with the duties and functions that have been mandated by the provisions of the legislation.…”