AbstrakTulisan ini menguraikan perkembangannya teknologi yang mendasari suatu tipe baru sistem budaya yang mengatur kembali keseluruhan dunia sosial sebagai objek kontrol. Teknologi bukan sekedar bermakna akan tetapi telah menjadi suatu lingkungan dan suatu jalan hidup dan ini merupakan dampak yang substantif (substantif impact). Internet merupakan simbol material embrio masyarakat global yang menawarkan ruang baru yaitu cyberspace realitas baru yaitu realitas virtual, komunitas baru yaitu virtual community. Dalam rangka mencegah cyber crime tidak cukup hanya melalui pengaturan melalui undang-undang. Hal ini dikarenakan penggunaan hukum pidana dalam penanggulangan kejahatan hanya merupakan kurieren am symptom. Hal ini dikarenakan hukum pidana hanya merupakan pengobatan simptomatik dan bukan pengobatan kausatif. Berkaitan dengan perkembangan ilmu pengetahuan dan teknologi yang menimbulkan permasalahan di bidang hukum, aparat penegak hukum yaitu hakim dapat menggunakan kekuasaan yang luas sebagai judge made law. Kata kunci: Dampak Negatif; Teknologi Informasi, Pengguna Internet A. PENDAHULUANHukum, teknologi informasi dan globalisasi merupakan tiga bidang yang saling terkait. Hal ini dikarenakan perkembangan teknologi yang sangat cepat beserta penyebaran produk-produknya dimungkinkan karena adanya globalisasi dan dampaknya terasa pula di bidang hukum.

The fulfillment of political rights for persons with mental disabilities in general elections has not been running as it should be. Pros and cons arise when collecting data on citizens who have the right to vote at the time of general elections. This research analyzes how the fulfillment of the political rights of persons with mental disabilities in legislation and the obstacles experienced in fulfilling the political rights of persons with mental disabilities. This research is a normative juridical study using secondary data as the main data, namely books, journals, research results, and legislation. Secondary data were analyzed normatively qualitative. The results showed that the political rights of persons with disabilities, including persons with mental disabilities, are a component of human rights that must be fulfilled in a democratic country. The fulfillment of the political rights of persons with disabilities is generally based on Law Number 8 of 2016, namely Article 13 which stipulates that persons with disabilities have the political right to vote and be elected in public office. These rights are important to be respected, protected and fulfilled in order to achieve justice for eliminating political discrimination against persons with disabilities. As for the obstacles experienced in fulfilling the political rights of persons with mental disabilities, namely the difficulty in conveying socialization materials to persons with mental disabilities and the level of voter participation among persons with mental disabilities is still low.Keywords: Political Rights, General Election, Mental Disability

The task of the judge in realizing justice is inseparable from the decisions that are made. A qualified judge's decision is obtained through the judge's thought process through a choice of judges that reflects judicial activism. The problem in this research is how judicial activism is used by judges in issuing decisions and how the implementation of judicial activism in decision making. Judicial Activism is the choice of decision making by judges in order to realize justice. Judicial activism in the Indonesian judicial system is regulated in Article 5 paragraph (1) of Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power. The law requires judges to explore the law and sense of justice that lives in society. The implementation of judicial activism is carried out by judges through means of legal discovery. Through means of legal discovery, judges play an active role in realizing justice as a law that lives in a dynamically developing society.

No abstract

Administrative Courts in developing countries carry out more demanding tasks than those in developed countries because they have to be able to keep the balance between protecting public and individual interests. This research raises the issue of how to realize social justice in resolving a dispute in Administrative Courts. This is a doctrinal research using legal, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The research result indicates that Administrative Courts, carry out the oversight function against the acts of government officials, have to realize the justice which becomes the essence of the administrative law's goal, that is social justice. Social justice which is built on the basis of Pancasila, functions to maintain the balance between the individual interest and the society's rights so that the balance and harmony between the government and the people will be created. Furthermore, the Administrative Courts have to be able to realize the social justice, not only normative or procedural justices.