1985
DOI: 10.1002/1097-4679(198503)41:2<203::aid-jclp2270410212>3.0.co;2-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mexican Americans' performance on the MMPI as a function of level of acculturation

Abstract: Previous researchers have concluded that differences in MMPI performance between Anglo and Mexican American surnamed subjects were due to cultural differences. The present research directly investigated this assumption by comparing MMPI scale score differences of 365 Anglo and Mexican American college students, with Acculturation, Age, and Socioeconomic status statistically controlled. Anglos scored significantly differently from Mexican American subjects on 10 of the 13 MMPI scales. With Acculturation and Age… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of studies that compared Anglo-and Mexican-Americans on objective personality instruments has been sparse. Even utilizing the most popular inventory, the MMPI, only 11 studies that compared the two groups have been conducted (Montgomery & Orozco, 1985;Whitworth, 1988). Five of these studies employed deviant (prison, psychiatric, or addicted) populations, and six involved normal groups, including college students.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of studies that compared Anglo-and Mexican-Americans on objective personality instruments has been sparse. Even utilizing the most popular inventory, the MMPI, only 11 studies that compared the two groups have been conducted (Montgomery & Orozco, 1985;Whitworth, 1988). Five of these studies employed deviant (prison, psychiatric, or addicted) populations, and six involved normal groups, including college students.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Critics (e.g., Dana, 1995;Dana & Whatley, 1991;Malgady et al, 1987,) argue that the MMPI (adult version) is racially biased against minority groups and results in overpathologizing members of diverse cultural groups. The basis of their criticism is the fact that some researchers (e.g., Montgomery & Orozco, 1985;Whitworth & Unterbrink, 1994) have found statistically significant differences in MMPI performance between Whites and Hispanics. However, despite the two ethnic groups' differential profiles, the largest T-score difference between Whites and Hispanics on the Clinical scales was 5.6 (with an average T-score difference of 2.6) in Montgomery and Orozco's (1985) study and 5.0 (with an average T-score difference of 2.2) in Whitworth and Unterbrink's (1994) study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basis of their criticism is the fact that some researchers (e.g., Montgomery & Orozco, 1985;Whitworth & Unterbrink, 1994) have found statistically significant differences in MMPI performance between Whites and Hispanics. However, despite the two ethnic groups' differential profiles, the largest T-score difference between Whites and Hispanics on the Clinical scales was 5.6 (with an average T-score difference of 2.6) in Montgomery and Orozco's (1985) study and 5.0 (with an average T-score difference of 2.2) in Whitworth and Unterbrink's (1994) study. Although these differences were statistically significant, they are inconsequential from a clinical standpoint and were likely the artifactual results of large sample sizes (Whitworth & Unterbrink, 1994).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results for the Mexican-American population have been mixed and inconclusive (Montgomery & Orozco, 1985;Padilla et al, 1982;Reilly & Knight, 1970). The lack of conclusive results may be attributable to the poor design of the studies.…”
Section: Summary Of Rationale For the Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%