2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2021.103107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MFCC-based Recurrent Neural Network for automatic clinical depression recognition and assessment from speech

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
47
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors of this paper acknowledge that higher baseline F1-scores for the test set have been reported in [31,14]. However, a comparison cannot be made because, unlike the approach in this paper, those systems either employed a different evaluation protocol such as segment-level predictions or re-partitioned the train-validation-test splits.…”
Section: Multi Frame Rate Trainingmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The authors of this paper acknowledge that higher baseline F1-scores for the test set have been reported in [31,14]. However, a comparison cannot be made because, unlike the approach in this paper, those systems either employed a different evaluation protocol such as segment-level predictions or re-partitioned the train-validation-test splits.…”
Section: Multi Frame Rate Trainingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In this work, DepAudioNet was chosen as a baseline mainly because of DepAudioNet's open-source code [24]. The original paper where DepAudioNet was first proposed [9] did not report test-set results because of the unavailability of ground truth labels and computed the F1-score for predictions at the speaker level and not at the frame level [14] nor the segment level [31]. Unfortunately, there is a lack of consensus regarding the evaluation protocols for the DAIC-WOZ dataset.…”
Section: Multi Frame Rate Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations