2012
DOI: 10.1186/bcr3096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MIBE acts as antagonist ligand of both estrogen receptor α and GPER in breast cancer cells

Abstract: IntroductionThe multiple biological responses to estrogens are mainly mediated by the classical estrogen receptors ERα and ERβ, which act as ligand-activated transcription factors. ERα exerts a main role in the development of breast cancer; therefore, the ER antagonist tamoxifen has been widely used although its effectiveness is limited by de novo and acquired resistance. Recently, GPR30/GPER, a member of the seven-transmembrane G protein-coupled receptor family, has been implicated in mediating the effects of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
84
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
6
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 H]E2 in ER-negative GPER-expressing whole cells (Teng et al, 2008;Lappano et al, 2010Lappano et al, , 2012bChimento et al, 2014a). In one example, GPERexpressing SKBR3 cells were incubated with [ 3 H]E2 in the presence or absence of competing ligands for 2 hours at 37°C.…”
Section: G Protein-coupled Estrogen Receptor Binding Using Radioliganmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3 H]E2 in ER-negative GPER-expressing whole cells (Teng et al, 2008;Lappano et al, 2010Lappano et al, , 2012bChimento et al, 2014a). In one example, GPERexpressing SKBR3 cells were incubated with [ 3 H]E2 in the presence or absence of competing ligands for 2 hours at 37°C.…”
Section: G Protein-coupled Estrogen Receptor Binding Using Radioliganmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one example, GPERexpressing SKBR3 cells were incubated with [ 3 H]E2 in the presence or absence of competing ligands for 2 hours at 37°C. The cells were washed with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline, extracted with 100% ethanol and the radioactivity of the extracts measured by liquid scintillation counting, with competitor binding expressed as a percentage of maximal specific binding (Lappano et al, 2012b). Alternatively, trichloroacetic acid-based protein precipitation followed by solubilization in 0.1 N NaOH was employed (Chimento et al, 2014a).…”
Section: G Protein-coupled Estrogen Receptor Binding Using Radioliganmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, only a molecule exhibited inhibitory properties toward both GPER and ER. This agent named MIBE (30), which was tested in silico using as target ERα, displayed a binding mode similar to that adopted by the ER antagonist OHT in the crystal structure (47) (PDB code 3ERT). When GPER was used as the protein target, MIBE adopted a binding mode which differs from that adopted by G-1 (Fig.…”
Section: Endogenous and Exogenous Gper Ligand Binding Modesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the aforementioned approaches, several different natural and synthetic ligands of GPER (Fig. 1) have been identified along with their binding modes as resulting from docking simulations (13,(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the G protein-coupled receptor (GPR)30/GPER has been shown to mediate estrogenic signaling in different normal and malignant cell contexts, including breast cancer (3)(4)(5)(6)(7). In this regard, the identification of selective GPER agonists or antagonists (8)(9)(10)(11)(12) has allowed the evaluation of certain biological responses elicited through GPER. Actually, GPER activates a network of transduction pathways involving the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), the intracellular cyclic AMP (cAMP), the mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) cascade, and calcium mobilization (13)(14)(15).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%