1978
DOI: 10.1021/jo00400a031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micellar effects upon the hydrogen ion and general acid catalyzed hydration of 1,4-dihydropyridines

Abstract: The rate-limiting step in the hydration of 1-benzyldihydronicotinamide (la) and l-benzyl-3-acetyl-l,4-dihydropyridine (lb) is a slow proton transfer, as shown by the kinetic deuterium solvent isotope effects and buffer catalysis. Reactions in dilute HCI are strongly inhibited by cationic micelles of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTABr) and the inhibition can he related to the micellar binding of the substrates determined spectrophotometrically or by solubility. Anionic micelles of sodium lauryl sulfate (NaLS… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed results in presence of CTAB are summarized in Table 1. It is not surprising because ionic micelles shows a marked difference in the effective local pH to exist at its micellar surface over that in bulk aqueous solvent [44,45]. The different pH in the micellar pseudo phase of ionic micelles is understandable because most of the acidic and/or basic species should be in the micellar phase and in addition pKs in micellar systems are all most of time different from the pKs measured in water.…”
Section: Role Of Surfactants In the Stabilization Of Nanoparticlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observed results in presence of CTAB are summarized in Table 1. It is not surprising because ionic micelles shows a marked difference in the effective local pH to exist at its micellar surface over that in bulk aqueous solvent [44,45]. The different pH in the micellar pseudo phase of ionic micelles is understandable because most of the acidic and/or basic species should be in the micellar phase and in addition pKs in micellar systems are all most of time different from the pKs measured in water.…”
Section: Role Of Surfactants In the Stabilization Of Nanoparticlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2]. The binding constant, K N , was determined independently also by following the spectrophotometric method (26). The chosen wavelength was 251 nm at which the changes in absorbances were maximum for the ninhydrin binding with CTAB.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4), suggesting that binds to cationic micelles despite 9.0 ϫ 10 dm binding constants were calculated by Bunton's method [30], which were 1412 and 108 dm 3 for CTAB Ϫ1 mol and CPB, respectively. The associated may Ϫ HCrO 4 exist either inside the Stern layer or at the interface between the micellar surface and the bulk solvent.…”
Section: Analysis Of Observed Data: K ؊ [Surfactant]mentioning
confidence: 99%