2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11858-021-01230-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micro-analysis of noticing: a lens on prospective teachers’ trajectories of learning to notice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kersting (2008) asked participants open questions based on video clips but quantified the data, which resulted in a set of three levels of interpretation ranging from descriptive comments to a coherent analysis. Bragelman et al (2021) compared common methods for analyzing the development of the noticing competence (such as the method implemented by Jacobs et al, 2010) and then used a "micro-analysis of noticing" to identify developments at a smaller, more fine-grained scale. The framework by Jacobs et al (2010) and the Learning to Notice framework (van Es, 2011) are often used but are also regularly modified to match the specific needs, underlying conceptualizations, and research goals, which makes a comparison of data difficult (Amador, 2019).…”
Section: Measuring (Prospective) Teachers' Noticing Competenciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kersting (2008) asked participants open questions based on video clips but quantified the data, which resulted in a set of three levels of interpretation ranging from descriptive comments to a coherent analysis. Bragelman et al (2021) compared common methods for analyzing the development of the noticing competence (such as the method implemented by Jacobs et al, 2010) and then used a "micro-analysis of noticing" to identify developments at a smaller, more fine-grained scale. The framework by Jacobs et al (2010) and the Learning to Notice framework (van Es, 2011) are often used but are also regularly modified to match the specific needs, underlying conceptualizations, and research goals, which makes a comparison of data difficult (Amador, 2019).…”
Section: Measuring (Prospective) Teachers' Noticing Competenciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another area of study is curricular noticing, which investigates what aspects of instructional materials teachers pay attention to (Dietiker et al, 2018). Other noticing‐related research includes integrating technology as a way to better understand what is noticed (Fernández et al, 2012; Kosko et al, 2021), and developing and measuring noticing in teachers (Bragelman et al, 2021; Castro Superfine et al, 2019). The scores of work on noticing have slight variations, and the knowledge base is disparate without a clear synthesis or understanding of these variations in language and frameworks.…”
Section: Framing Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We suggest that developing an observed noticing trajectory will assist teacher educators to plan and sequence learning activities that will build PMTs' noticing practice before entering student teaching. Bragelman et al (2021) "posit that few studies, if any, account for how PTs [prospective teachers], as novices, learn" (p. 216), because data analysis has focused on typically two time points in the learning process, which may be problematic to capture changes in PMTs' noticing. This suggests that the pre-post analysis may not be sensitive enough to capture the learning of PMTs' noticing.…”
Section: Perspective and Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that PMTs must learn to decipher among the “blooming, buzzing confusion of sensory data” (Sherin & Star, 2011, p. 69) that happens in their classroom. PMTs are novice teachers who “have yet to develop the expertise to determine what is and is not important in a classroom setting” (Bragelman et al, 2021, p. 215). Therefore, it is important to understand not only what PMTs are noticing but assist them in learning to determine what is important and what is not.…”
Section: Perspective and Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation